On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:15 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> gcc2 even the one updated by haiku has bugs. I don't think we should
> go long way just to support it. Hence I withdraw my request for
> holding this patch back because of it
Both patches have been committed.
Mirroring to
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 08:34:41PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> Haiku can be compiled and can use either gcc 4.x or gcc2.95. The main
>> reason for them to keep gcc 2.95 possibility is the binary
>> compatibility with BeOS. A
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 08:34:41PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Haiku can be compiled and can use either gcc 4.x or gcc2.95. The main
> reason for them to keep gcc 2.95 possibility is the binary
> compatibility with BeOS. As François Revol explained me on IRC C++ ABI
> changed from
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> > ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > * boot/i386/pc/boot.S: Remove ABS macro, it's useless now.
>> Could you wai
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > * boot/i386/pc/boot.S: Remove ABS macro, it's useless now.
> Could you wait before committing this patch? I'm currently making
> grub2
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> ChangeLog:
>
> * boot/i386/pc/boot.S: Remove ABS macro, it's useless now.
Could you wait before committing this patch? I'm currently making
grub2 compiling with gcc 2.95 supplied as a possibility (another one
is gcc 4.x) with haiku. The
ChangeLog:
* boot/i386/pc/boot.S: Remove ABS macro, it's useless now.
---
boot/i386/pc/boot.S | 23 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot/i386/pc/boot.S b/boot/i386/pc/boot.S
index 8a8f6c7..77319a7 100644
--- a/boot/i386/pc/boot.S
+
