On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 20:24 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Now I agree with you. No further oppositions from me
Committed.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gr
> There then there is an issue of user choice. I think we are offering
> too many choices without explaining what's behind it.
>
> I could say lzo is "old and proven" and lzma is "new and more
> effective", but since lzo is disabled by default and there are no
> complaints about it, keeping lzo be
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 20:18 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> It doesn't break things, since it's barely modified, and doesn't interact with
> the rest of the code, but simply having more code means an added work to
> maintain it when we restructure things, etc. It needs to pay off in some way.
Exac
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > * Makefile.in: Remove LIBLZO and enable_lzo.
> > * conf/i386-pc.rmk: Remove lzo support.
> > * configure.ac: Remove check
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> ChangeLog:
>
> * Makefile.in: Remove LIBLZO and enable_lzo.
> * conf/i386-pc.rmk: Remove lzo support.
> * configure.ac: Remove checks for lzo, don't define ENABLE_LZMA.
> * include/grub/i386/pc/kernel.h: Define ENABL
ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in: Remove LIBLZO and enable_lzo.
* conf/i386-pc.rmk: Remove lzo support.
* configure.ac: Remove checks for lzo, don't define ENABLE_LZMA.
* include/grub/i386/pc/kernel.h: Define ENABLE_LZMA. Remove lzo
support.
* kern/i386/pc/
