On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 14:01 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> Apple's compiler is based GCC but binutils aren't and they pose the
>> most of problems. Actualy the most problematic bit was that I didn't
>> know that unless you pref
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 14:01 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Apple's compiler is based GCC but binutils aren't and they pose the
> most of problems. Actualy the most problematic bit was that I didn't
> know that unless you prefix variable with L_ apple's assembler treats
> it as globa
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Apple linker can't handle 64-bit differences
>>
>> This seems like a bug. Can GNU binutils be used on MacOS to resolve this?
>>
>> If it's workable, I'd rather make binutils a build requirement than addin
Robert Millan writes:
[...]
>> Apple linker can't handle 64-bit differences
>
> This seems like a bug. Can GNU binutils be used on MacOS to resolve this?
>
> If it's workable, I'd rather make binutils a build requirement than adding
> more of this (the other APPLE_CC ifdefs will probably need s
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> >> +extern grub_uint64_t grub_relocator32_backward_src;
> >> +#else
> >> +extern grub_uint32_t grub_relocator32_backward_src;
> >> +#endif
> >
> > You could make this a pointer, or grub_uintptr_
>> +#ifdef __x86_64__
>> +extern grub_uint64_t grub_relocator32_backward_src;
>> +#else
>> +extern grub_uint32_t grub_relocator32_backward_src;
>> +#endif
>
> You could make this a pointer, or grub_uintptr_t
> (the latter we don't yet have, it seems like a good excuse to
> add it if a pointer is no
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello. As discussed on IRC it would be preferable if all loaders use
> flexible technics for loading kernels using relocators as currently
> multiboot and xnu does.
Well, as for what I said on IRC, I'm not sure if it'
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello. As discussed on IRC it would be preferable if all loaders use
> flexible technics for loading kernels using relocators as currently
> multiboot and xnu does. Here is a relocator framework based on
> multiboot and xnu relo
Hello. As discussed on IRC it would be preferable if all loaders use
flexible technics for loading kernels using relocators as currently
multiboot and xnu does. Here is a relocator framework based on
multiboot and xnu relocator. As an advantage it switches from x86-64
to i386 if necessary. With it
