Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi/fdt: set #address-cells/#size-cells on empty tree

2018-06-15 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 04:37:34PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:24:57PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > > Set #address-cells and #size-cells properties (to 2) for ARM*/UEFI > > > systems when creating an e

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi/fdt: set #address-cells/#size-cells on empty tree

2018-06-14 Thread Leif Lindholm
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:24:57PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > Set #address-cells and #size-cells properties (to 2) for ARM*/UEFI > > systems when creating an empty DT at boot time. This resolves an issue > > seen in the wild with

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi/fdt: set #address-cells/#size-cells on empty tree

2018-06-14 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:24:57PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > Set #address-cells and #size-cells properties (to 2) for ARM*/UEFI > systems when creating an empty DT at boot time. This resolves an issue > seen in the wild with kexec on certain 64-bit ARM systems. > > First part is moving out the

[PATCH 0/2] efi/fdt: set #address-cells/#size-cells on empty tree

2018-06-11 Thread Leif Lindholm
Set #address-cells and #size-cells properties (to 2) for ARM*/UEFI systems when creating an empty DT at boot time. This resolves an issue seen in the wild with kexec on certain 64-bit ARM systems. First part is moving out the prop_entry_size macro from lib/fdt.c and make it available in (with the