Am 2010-10-26 10:58, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko:
Please try the attached patch
yes, this patch seems to fix the problem!
thanks!
martin
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-dev
On 09/27/2010 10:32 PM, Martin Schitter wrote:
> the actual raid implementation doesn't handle spare or faulty drives
> in a linux software raid array in a sane way. grub-probe will
> reproducible crash in such a setup.
>
> please include the attached trivial patch to fix this problem.
>
Please try
On 10/25/2010 01:07 PM, Martin Schitter wrote:
> Am 2010-09-28 22:24, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko:
>> I didn't respond to the patch because it's not correct: it only
>> propagates the restriction instead of removing it. Thanks for reporting
>> the issue. I'll fix it tomorrow (hope
Am 2010-09-28 22:24, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko:
I didn't respond to the patch because it's not correct: it only
propagates the restriction instead of removing it. Thanks for reporting
the issue. I'll fix it tomorrow (hopefully)
the problem with version 1.x raid spare disks s
Am 2010-09-28 22:24, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko:
I didn't respond to the patch because it's not correct: it only
propagates the restriction instead of removing it. Thanks for reporting
the issue. I'll fix it tomorrow (hopefully)
yes, there are more consequent ways to solve th
On 09/27/2010 10:32 PM, Martin Schitter wrote:
> the actual raid implementation doesn't handle spare or faulty drives
> in a linux software raid array in a sane way. grub-probe will
> reproducible crash in such a setup.
>
> please include the attached trivial patch to fix this problem.
>
I didn't r
the actual raid implementation doesn't handle spare or faulty drives in
a linux software raid array in a sane way. grub-probe will reproducible
crash in such a setup.
please include the attached trivial patch to fix this problem.
for more information see:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31119
