On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:05:29 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 03:14:39PM +, Chris Coulson wrote:
> > The initial implementation of the stack protector just busy looped
> > in __stack_chk_fail in order to reduce the amount of code being
> > executed after the stack has been
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 03:14:39PM +, Chris Coulson wrote:
> The initial implementation of the stack protector just busy looped
> in __stack_chk_fail in order to reduce the amount of code being
> executed after the stack has been compromised because of a lack of
> firmware memory protections. W
The initial implementation of the stack protector just busy looped
in __stack_chk_fail in order to reduce the amount of code being
executed after the stack has been compromised because of a lack of
firmware memory protections. With future firmware implementations
incorporating memory protections su
