On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems our ISO UUID code was checking for modified date rather than created
> date as the source suggests. I believe this is the right thing to do (since
> theoretically two different images could share creation date),
Hi,
It seems our ISO UUID code was checking for modified date rather than created
date as the source suggests. I believe this is the right thing to do (since
theoretically two different images could share creation date), so my patch
just renames it (and adds the real field for creation date whil