comitted
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Anyway, given that grub-emu is a debugging/development tool, I'm not sure
>> it's that useful to export those flags to autoconf. We could just live
>> with #ifdefs in the code IMHO. Distributors are going to
> Anyway, given that grub-emu is a debugging/development tool, I'm not sure
> it's that useful to export those flags to autoconf. We could just live
> with #ifdefs in the code IMHO. Distributors are going to ship whatever we
> choose as default for grub-emu anyway.
>
Actually the problem isn't gr
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:46:06AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> Generally, please think how to reduce complexity, not how to add to it.
> Complex systems are harder to maintain.
In general, I completely agree with this.
However grub-emu has very special requirements that could make it desireab
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:27 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Hello. This is a fix for problem in subject line. I believe this fix
> > to be correct and legitimate but as I don't know ruby well could
> > someone review it? If no
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:27 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello. This is a fix for problem in subject line. I believe this fix
> to be correct and legitimate but as I don't know ruby well could
> someone review it? If nobody knows ruby in depth I think we can commit
> this even with
Hello. This is a fix for problem in subject line. I believe this fix
to be correct and legitimate but as I don't know ruby well could
someone review it? If nobody knows ruby in depth I think we can commit
this even without deep review
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
diff --git a/ChangeLo
