Quoting Jordi Mallach :
> /dev/hda2 974K 697K 278K 72% /boot/grub
It's OK for GRUB, but it's not big enough to hold kernels. Also,
distributions may be reluctant to break the assumption that the kernels
are located on a filesystem with POSIX access control and three kinds of
tim
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:26:35PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > I agree that grub-install and the other tools should know more about
> > /boot/grub being a separate partition in order to be able to mount it for a
> > correct install. Not so much on the two boostrap partitions, my tiny one
> > as
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 14:38 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:39:56AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Please realize that the hfs fix is just a part of what needs to be done.
> >
> > For GRUB to be a drop-in replacement for yaboot (at least on Fedora),
> > the instal
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:39:56AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Please realize that the hfs fix is just a part of what needs to be done.
>
> For GRUB to be a drop-in replacement for yaboot (at least on Fedora),
> the installation script should be able to understand the layout where
> only few
Hi, I'm attaching Michel's reply to this post, as he isn't subscribed.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:23:39AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> However, I'm having the same boot problems as before. I've installed
> the new version of GRUB to OF, and when I boot I get the known "initrd:
> command not found
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 04:23 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Thanks for rescuing this fix!
>
> Felix uploaded a new GRUB snapshot which should include this patch.
>
> However, I'm having the same boot problems as before.
Please realize that the hfs fix is just a part of what needs to be done.
For
Hi Pavel,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:37:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It's a shame the discussion about hfs got nowhere. I've made another
> patch. I didn't look at the Linux hfs sources or at any previous
> patches. I took the case ordering table from hfsutils 3.2.6, which is
>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:37:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It's a shame the discussion about hfs got nowhere. I've made another
> patch. I didn't look at the Linux hfs sources or at any previous
> patches. I took the case ordering table from hfsutils 3.2.6, which is
> licensed u
Hello!
It's a shame the discussion about hfs got nowhere. I've made another
patch. I didn't look at the Linux hfs sources or at any previous
patches. I took the case ordering table from hfsutils 3.2.6, which is
licensed under GPL v2 or newer. Then I ran the table through a simple
program to ma
