On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:21:21PM -0400, Alec Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:38:04PM +0100, Darren Kenny wrote:
> > Hi Ross,
> >
> > This looks good to me.
> >
> > On Thursday, 2022-07-14 at 09:41:28 -04, Ross Philipson wrote:
> > > The way the code is written the tofree variable would
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:38:04PM +0100, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> On Thursday, 2022-07-14 at 09:41:28 -04, Ross Philipson wrote:
> > The way the code is written the tofree variable would never be
> > passed to the free_subchunk() function uninitialized. Cover
Hi Ross,
This looks good to me.
On Thursday, 2022-07-14 at 09:41:28 -04, Ross Philipson wrote:
> The way the code is written the tofree variable would never be
> passed to the free_subchunk() function uninitialized. Coverity
> cannot determine this and flags the situation as "Using uninitialized
The way the code is written the tofree variable would never be
passed to the free_subchunk() function uninitialized. Coverity
cannot determine this and flags the situation as "Using uninitialized
value...". The fix is just to initialize the local struct.
Fixes: CID 314016
Signed-off-by: Ross Phil
