On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 00:45 +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2009 22:16:58 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" :
> > > "test -n" should be avoided. Maybe this is not necessary nowadays, but my
> > > old lesson was to use "test x$target_alias != x" instead for
On Saturday 11 April 2009 22:16:58 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" :
> > "test -n" should be avoided. Maybe this is not necessary nowadays, but my
> > old lesson was to use "test x$target_alias != x" instead for portability.
> > Well, "!=" was not very portable, either, maybe.
>
Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" :
"test -n" should be avoided. Maybe this is not necessary nowadays, but my old
lesson was to use "test x$target_alias != x" instead for portability.
Well, "!=" was not very portable, either, maybe.
I believe both "-n" and "!=" are found in Autoconf sources that ar
On Saturday 11 April 2009 13:58:26 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I promised this patch long ago, but didn't have a chance to implement
> and test it. This patch would help users test GRUB using
> cross-compilers. Many users would prefer to compile native GRUB
> utilities (grub-mkimage etc) but
Hello!
I promised this patch long ago, but didn't have a chance to implement
and test it. This patch would help users test GRUB using
cross-compilers. Many users would prefer to compile native GRUB
utilities (grub-mkimage etc) but create the bootloader for another
platform. This is cur
