Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:53 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>
>> Please do not put words in my mouth, that is not what I said. I said
>> looking at Linux *code* should be avoided.
>
> I agree with you. I was referring to what I did, not to what you said.
G
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:53 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Please do not put words in my mouth, that is not what I said. I said
> looking at Linux *code* should be avoided.
I agree with you. I was referring to what I did, not to what you said.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 17:20 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
>> Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 14:49 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
>> >> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Sun, 2008-0
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:20 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > So what? Aren't both Linux and GRUB under the GPL? That _should_ mean
>> > that we can look at their code and put it into GRUB ("create a
>> > d
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:20 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So what? Aren't both Linux and GRUB under the GPL? That _should_ mean
> > that we can look at their code and put it into GRUB ("create a
> > derivative work") either as-is or modified.
>
> F
El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 17:20 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
> Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 14:49 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
> >> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:55 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> >> P
Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 14:49 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
>> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:55 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> >> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> > I know. That's why I'l
El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 14:49 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió:
> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:55 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> > I know. That's why I'll write it from specifications or maybe I'll
> >> >
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:55 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > I know. That's why I'll write it from specifications or maybe I'll
>> > take it from the GNU/Hurd code.
>>
>> Taking it from Specifications will b
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:55 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I know. That's why I'll write it from specifications or maybe I'll
> > take it from the GNU/Hurd code.
>
> Taking it from Specifications will be better.
>
> I think the ATA driver of GNU Mach
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> I cannot get the ata module to recognize the hard drive on my test
>>> machine, so more work is needed to test it on the real hardware.
>>
>> Right, this needs more work. I will have another look at ATA so
Quoting Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I cannot get the ata module to recognize the hard drive on my test
machine, so more work is needed to test it on the real hardware.
Right, this needs more work. I will have another look at ATA soon :-)
That would be great!
If you check Linux incl
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:27 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>
>> The more patches I get, the better ;-)
>>
>> > ChangeLog:
>> >
>> >* disk/ata.c (grub_ata_pio_write): Check status before writing,
>> >like we do in grub_ata_pio_read().
>> >
>> >(g
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:27 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> The more patches I get, the better ;-)
>
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > * disk/ata.c (grub_ata_pio_write): Check status before writing,
> > like we do in grub_ata_pio_read().
> >
> > (grub_ata_readwrite): Always write individual sector
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have save_env now, so we can use the write capability. This also
> fixes the last compiler warning in GRUB.
Great!
> Sorry, Marco, please ignore the previous message, as it didn't get to
> the list.
The more patches I get, the better ;-)
> ChangeL
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:17:16PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> + if (grub_ata_regget (dev, GRUB_ATA_REG_STATUS) & 1)
> +return grub_ata_regget (dev, GRUB_ATA_REG_ERROR);
May I suggest a macro to describe this "1"?
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What good is a p
We have save_env now, so we can use the write capability. This also
fixes the last compiler warning in GRUB.
Sorry, Marco, please ignore the previous message, as it didn't get to
the list.
ChangeLog:
* disk/ata.c (grub_ata_pio_write): Check status before writing,
like we do in g
17 matches
Mail list logo
