On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:51:04PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Revised patch follows, also addressing Felix's comment. Is this better?
>
> Looks fine.
Committed, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [cj
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:51:04PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:20:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Index: configure.ac
> > > ===
> > >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:20:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Index: configure.ac
> > ===
> > --- configure.ac(revision 2584)
> > +++ configure.ac(working cop
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> John Taylor reported that this patch fixes one of his problems in
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27349. It's been a while since I had
> anything to do with Autoconf's cross-compiling support, so does this
> look reasonable? The "cross
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> John Taylor reported that this patch fixes one of his problems in
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27349. It's been a while since I had
> anything to do with Autoconf's cross-compiling support, so does this
> look reasonable? The "cr
John Taylor reported that this patch fixes one of his problems in
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27349. It's been a while since I had
anything to do with Autoconf's cross-compiling support, so does this
look reasonable? The "cross_compiling" variable was added in a
considerably older version of Auto
