On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 01:09 -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-12/msg00024.html
>
> It is the attachment.
Applied.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
ent of GRUB 2
> Cc: Pavel Roskin; Jerone Young
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] --build-id= none in newer ld versions PowerPC
>
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:09:50AM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-12/msg00024.html
> >
> > It is
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:09:50AM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-12/msg00024.html
>
> It is the attachment.
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> > Quoting Jerone Young :
> >
> > Did anyone have any objections to this patc
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-12/msg00024.html
It is the attachment.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Jerone Young :
>
> Did anyone have any objections to this patch. Not sure if anyone had any
>> craving to use --build-id. If not I'll check it
Quoting Jerone Young :
Did anyone have any objections to this patch. Not sure if anyone had any
craving to use --build-id. If not I'll check it in in the next week.
Where is the current version of the patch? Can we have a look first?
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Did anyone have any objections to this patch. Not sure if anyone had any
craving to use --build-id. If not I'll check it in in the next week.
Jerone
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Manoel Rebelo Abranches <
mrab...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrot
There are any objections for this patch? Without this grub wont work in
PowerPC when using newer ld version.
thanks
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:08 -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> Hi made a patch to add --build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS instead of
> MODULE_LDFLAGS. with this it is passed to ld
Hi made a patch to add --build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS instead of
MODULE_LDFLAGS. with this it is passed to ld when linking kernel.elf.
without this kernel.elf creates a additional LOAD segment with a virtual
address in PhysAddr witch causes problem with OF and causes
grub-mkelfimage to not work
The variable TARGET_LDFLAGS. isnt set but MODULE_LDFLAGS is instead.
if test "x$grub_cv_prog_ld_build_id_none" = xyes; then
MODULE_LDFLAGS="$MODULE_LDFLAGS -Wl,--build-id=none"
I could change to use TARGET_LDFLAGS if it wont brake other
architectures.
We were using PPC_BUILD_ID_FLAG becaus
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 19:14 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> No no. I mean just KERNEL_LDFLAGS like comparison to MODULE_LDFLAGS. No
> elf or nothing like that. Is there any problem if one provides this
> setting even on x86 if linker recognizes it? (what is being tested
> here). PPC_BUILD_ID_FLA
Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:01 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
>>> This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
>>> kernel.elf.
>>> This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
>>
>>> if test "x$grub_cv_
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:01 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> > This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
> > kernel.elf.
> > This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
>
>
> > if test "x$grub_cv_prog_ld_build_id_none" = xyes;
Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
> kernel.elf.
> This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
> if test "x$grub_cv_prog_ld_build_id_none" = xyes; then
>MODULE_LDFLAGS="$MODULE_LDFLAGS -Wl,--build-id=none"
> + PPC_BU
This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
kernel.elf.
This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index: aclocal.m4
14 matches
Mail list logo
