On 3/27/19 12:36 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:45:02AM -0600, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>> On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>>> wrote:
>>> Recent versions of binutils dropped support for the a.out and COFF
>>> formats on sparc64 targets. Since the boot loa
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:45:02AM -0600, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > wrote:
> > Recent versions of binutils dropped support for the a.out and COFF
> > formats on sparc64 targets. Since the boot loader on sparc64 is
> > supposed to be an a.o
> On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:47 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> Recent versions of binutils dropped support for the a.out and COFF
> formats on sparc64 targets. Since the boot loader on sparc64 is
> supposed to be an a.out binary and the a.out header entries are
> rather simple to calcul
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:47:16AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Recent versions of binutils dropped support for the a.out and COFF
> formats on sparc64 targets. Since the boot loader on sparc64 is
> supposed to be an a.out binary and the a.out header entries are
> rather simple to calc
Recent versions of binutils dropped support for the a.out and COFF
formats on sparc64 targets. Since the boot loader on sparc64 is
supposed to be an a.out binary and the a.out header entries are
rather simple to calculate in our case, we just write the header
ourselves instead of relying on externa
