2012/9/29 Andrey Borzenkov
> Attached are suggested implementation for UEFI support. Because ESP can
> contain arbitrary number of boot entries, it is itself implemented as
> extensible framework.
>
> 1. /usr/lib/os-prober/mounted/05efi
>
> Makes basic plausibility checks (FAT and /EFI exists) an
> > 1) why does 'grub-install' (without any parameter) work for Ubuntu12.04
> > (grub1.99) ?
>
> Probably because your kernel doesn't handle EFI properly so grub-install
> wasn't able to detect it (/sys/firmware/efi was missing).
Hi Vladimir
- here is an example where /sys/firmware/efi is not mi
2012/9/25 Chris Murphy
>
> On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and
> not necessarily booted in EFI mode).
> It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do th
;
ok thanks!
Regards
Yann
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:12 PM, yannubu...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Take a system with grub-efi 2.00 package already installed.
> > How do you u
2012/7/5 Jordan Uggla
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:19 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Dear GRUB devs/helpers,
> >
> > A) Which are the situations where the --recheck option of grub-install
> must
> > NOT be used? why grub-install wouldn't systematical
Dear GRUB devs/helpers,
A) Which are the situations where the --recheck option of grub-install must
NOT be used? why grub-install wouldn't systematically probe a device map by
default?
B) Some people recommend to use "grub-install /dev/sdX && grub-install
--recheck /dev/sdX", do you think it is c
Le samedi 5 mai 2012, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On 05.05.2012 18:02, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Dear GRUB devs,
>> First of all, thanks for your work.
>>
>> The "debconf-show grub-pc" comm
Dear GRUB devs,
First of all, thanks for your work.
The "debconf-show grub-pc" command shows a list of parameters, including
"grub-pc/install_devices".
Where is located the file where this "grub-pc/install_devices" parameter is
located, please?
(i am searching a way to modify it, not via dpkg-reco
Dear all,
do you know if this bug has been corrected in GRUB 1.99 ?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/796531
Regards
~Yann
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Dear all,
For the "Linux uninstaller" project [1], I need your help :
- Is there a reliable way to check (in bash) if a functional (not altered,
e.g. by another bootloader) stage1 is in a MBR ?
- Or/and the contrary (stage1 is altered or not present) ?
I observed that we can read (in hex) the wor
2010/12/15 yannubu...@gmail.com
> Dear all,
>
> I did the following test :
> - install Ubuntu 10.04 on my dev/sda3 , it is correctly recognized by
> os-prober
> - move all its files into a folder (to simulate its deletion while being
> able to easily restore it) :
> s
Dear all,
I did the following test :
- install Ubuntu 10.04 on my dev/sda3 , it is correctly recognized by
os-prober
- move all its files into a folder (to simulate its deletion while being
able to easily restore it) :
sudo mount /dev/sda3 /mnt ; sudo mkdir /mnt/test_delete; sudo mv /mnt/*
/mnt/t
2010/12/7 Colin Watson
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:20:13PM +0900, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
> >- I observed that GRUB2 writes on the 50 first sectors of my disk, can
> it
> >write between the 50th and 63th sectors ?
>
> That depends entirely on the size of
Dear all, first of all thank you for your work !
- I am coding a GNU-GPL app that "Uninstals Linux", you may be interested in
it : http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10210633
- I observed that GRUB2 writes on the 50 first sectors of my disk, can it
write between the 50th and 63th sectors ?
14 matches
Mail list logo
