On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM, peter cros wrote:
> It all seems a bit strange,
> [Linux-bzImage, setup=0x2c00, size=0x2ff4701]
> Size=50 MB - very big kernel if it is true.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Bean wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:32 AM,
On Thursday 08 January 2009 22:36:27 Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Ziling Zhao wrote:
> > I haven't had much success with testing directly on the XServe that I
> > have here, but I was able to get as far as getting grub to show up.
> > However, it stalls
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Ziling Zhao wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 21:14:48 Bean wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:54 PM, peter cros wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The kernel vesion may be the bug there, I have found grub.efi needs
> &
hem are
still using EFI 1.x, does Grub2 support EFI 1.x with x86_64?
I believe the kernel version that I am running is 2.6.27.
I'll try again with the x86_64 version of Grub2 tomorrow.
~Ziling Zhao
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
oader_boot.
Anybody know what this is doing?
I've heard that people have successfully gotten non rEFItted makes to boot
Linux, can anybody confirm this?
I compiled the grub2 stuff with "./configure --with-platform=efi
--target=i386",
