On Wed, 3 May 2017, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/05/17 08:06, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Fu Wei
> >
> > This patch adds the support of xen_boot command for aarch64:
> > xen_hypervisor
> > xen_module
> > These two commands are only for aarch64, since it has its own protocol and
> >
ober 2015 at 00:00, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > Hi Fu,
> >
> > I backported your patches to the CentOS aarch64 grub2 rpm. I am testing
> > it on X-Gene with EFI firmware. It works fine when booting Xen, but
> > booting native kernels (no Xen) doesn'
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi Fu,
>
> I backported your patches to the CentOS aarch64 grub2 rpm. I am testing
> it on X-Gene with EFI firmware. It works fine when booting Xen, but
> booting native kernels (no Xen) doesn't work anymore. Grub prints
>
Hi Fu,
I backported your patches to the CentOS aarch64 grub2 rpm. I am testing
it on X-Gene with EFI firmware. It works fine when booting Xen, but
booting native kernels (no Xen) doesn't work anymore. Grub prints
error: out of memory.
Press any key to continue...
grub is still able to continue
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check
> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support
> multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protocol uses
> memory mappings and loaded modules in simliar way to X
Ping?
I think it would be great to have multiboot support in grub.
As a matter of fact without it grub cannot load xen on arm.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> any suggestion for my patchset?
> if these patches look fine, can they be merged?
>
> Any feedback is welcome! :-)
Ping?
I think it would be great to have multiboot support in grub.
As a matter of fact without it grub cannot load xen on arm.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> any suggestion for my patchset?
> if these patches look fine, can they be merged?
>
> Any feedback is welcome! :-)
coder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 19.12.2013 12:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> On 18.12.2013 20:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 19.12.2013 12:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> On 18.12.2013 20:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>&
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 18.12.2013 20:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> On 17.12.2013 15:35, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> >>> Il 17/12/
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 17.12.2013 15:35, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> > Il 17/12/2013 15:10, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
> >> Il 17/12/2013 15:08, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko ha scritto:
> Thanks.
> Now there is another error, probably int
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a short summary of our discussion. It looks
> that we have two choices right now:
> - chainloader,
> - multiboot2 protocol.
>
> chainloader solution could be implemented quite easily. Some code should be
> added for command line parsi
12 matches
Mail list logo
