use direct
root=hd0,msdosX but this is not recommended due to device name instability.
Regards,
Manoel R. Abranches
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:00 AM Stuart Weaver
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> My current setup is a device that has eMMC and occasionally a USB both
> with GRUB installed
:
1 - Support for PXE.
2 - Support for ipv6.
3 - Other protocols beside TFTP, like DHCP and TCP based protocols.
--
Best regards,
Manoel R. Abranches
Software Engineer - LTC - IBM - Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
lue '1' to GRUB_MEMORY_AVAILABLE.
On 10/19/2010 11:46 AM, Manoel Rebelo Abraches wrote:
This is another version to the same fix.
The first patch 01_mem.patch creates a new function to allocate memory
using the "available" property in the "memory" node.
The second patch 0
st (made accordingly with sparc
implementation)
The patch was made passing -Bbp to diff as suggested by Vladimir.
I tested with RHEL/SUSE images and some RHEL/SUSE kernel I had and
worked correctly. Before the images failed to boot.
Thank you for reviewing this.
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 04:29
You can see a explanation at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-09/msg00205.html
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
Software engineer
IBM - Linux Technology Center - Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http
the
adress linuxaddr + entry + (PhysAddr- Entry), where Entry is the Entry
point address in the ELF header. (PhysAddr- Entry) gives the offset
where the linux entry point is located after linuxaddr.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
Software engineer
IBM - Linux Technology Center - Brazil
==
E_EMPTY \
{ 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, \
{ 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 } \
}
This code compiles fine in x86, is that a gcc bug? I'm using gcc 4.4.3
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo A
tml
> >
> > - but they are all years ago ...
> >
> > Or - is there any kind of netboot functionality in GRUB2 or being
> > worked on by anyone?
> >
> > John Lumby
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:45 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 05:27:33PM +0300, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
> Serbinenko wrote:
> > On 07/23/2010 11:02 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > So how would one explain to grub-install that it needs part_msdos when
> > > the partition
> error: no device is set.
> Entering rescue mode...
>
>
>
> grub rescue>
>
> So what do I do then to get it to know what device to use?
>
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
Software engineer
IBM - Linux Technology Center - Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Hi.
As talked with phcoder in #grub on freenode, there is a cleaner version
of the first patch, taking in consideration the recent changes in
ofconsole.
There is also a little fix to get the "~" character when the "DEL" key
is pressed.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 16:36 -0200, Ma
d prevent garbage to show up in the screen. This patch
was tested in both P5 and P6 machines.
Please review and let me know your opinion about it.
Thank you.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
Software engineer
IBM - Linux Technology Center - Brazil
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar
_t.
> > * kern/ieee1275/openfw.c (grub_children_iterate): Likewise.
> > (grub_devalias_iterate): Likewise.
>
> Ping? Review appreciated, thanks!
>
>
> ___
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gn
ink this overhead is not very relevant since this module won't go in
the image (created by grub-mkimage). Also it will be consistent with the
other commands and better organized(the halt command is actually very
similar).
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
IBM Linux Technology Center B
ne as grub_unit32_t type.
>
> Ping? I'm touching non-sparc code so at least one review would
> be appreciated before I check this in.
>
>
> ___
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Best Regards,
Manoel R
eee1275.rmk has two
> > kernel_elf_HEADERS in the first place ?
> >
> I have no idea, I was hoping that someone more familiar with build
> system could tell me why it's done so
>
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Rebelo Abranches
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
_
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
on so I can't tell at
the moment.
> - why wasn't search.mod loaded?
I think the search module isn't working in powerrPC, i have to look
better at it.
> - what to do about second-boot confusing search?
>
> Ah, also, my menu appears as white o
There are any objections for this patch? Without this grub wont work in
PowerPC when using newer ld version.
thanks
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:08 -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> Hi made a patch to add --build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS instead of
> MODULE_LDFLAGS. with this it is pas
There is already code
> adding -Wl,--build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS. It's a macro
> grub_PROG_LD_BUILD_ID_NONE in aclocal.m4. What's wrong with it? Does
> it fail to add -Wl,--build-id=none on PowerPC or is TARGET_LDFLAGS not
> used to link kernel.elf?
>
> What are t
om 0x20 to 0x10 makes
> _start equal 0x10 and resolves the "out of memory" problem.
>
> The "addr" variable comes from HEAP_MIN_SIZE, and it's also 0x20.
>
> I'm testing PowerPC code in qemu, which doesn't provide the memory
> in
g with it? Does
> it fail to add -Wl,--build-id=none on PowerPC or is TARGET_LDFLAGS not
> used to link kernel.elf?
>
> What are the symptoms caused by not using -Wl,--build-id=none?
>
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Ce
11:35 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:09 -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> > Can someone show me where grub2 uses device.map? I'm having a hard time
> > finding it in source.
>
> include/grub/util/misc.h:
>
> #define DEFAULT_DEVICE_
Can someone show me where grub2 uses device.map? I'm having a hard time
finding it in source.
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@g
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:01 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> > This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
> > kernel.elf.
> > This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
>
>
> > if test "x
This patch add --build-id=none option to newer ld versions when linking
kernel.elf.
This prevents grub-mkelfimage to behave wrongly.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index: aclo
kernelelf_LDFLAGS in the conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rm
file.
Thanks in advance for the help.
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 21:17 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:11:12PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> > But it is only passed in modules compilation. I need it when creating
> >
But it is only passed in modules compilation. I need it when creating
kernel.elf as well.
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 20:59 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:21:43PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote:
> > In the file conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk I need in newer ld ve
,-Ttext,0x20,-Bstatic
Should I move it from conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk to the configure script?
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.or
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
My patch only corrects the compilation error introduced by revision
1924. I have tested it in both P5 and P6 machines and all worked right.
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 16:30 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:58 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> > This patch corrects compilation in
This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due to some recent changes.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index: conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk
===
--- conf/powerpc-ieee12
This patch prevents that fancy characters show up in screen when keys
that the virtual terminal doesn't understand are pressed.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index: term/ieee1275/
same address used by Yaboot and is know to work well.
the makefile must be regenerated using the command:
$ ruby genmk.rb < conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk> conf/powerpc-ieee1275.mk
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index:
MIN_SIZE))
> /* only limit ourselves when we can afford to */
>
> Argueably, this is not my best piece of code... today I'd have implemented a
> payload relocator (like the one used by loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c) just so we
> can happily use everything in /
e have a
> runtime ELF linker in a bootloader?
>
> At any rate, the point of having dynamically loadable modules is so you
> can only load the ones you need. On that scale I think the size increase
> is less of an issue.
>
> > Maybe there is a way to keep the modules and the
sorry, forgot the patch.
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:18 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> I did this patch to add a gcc flag to the modules compilation. Is that
> the correct place to put this flag?
>
> Also I would like to know what the command "cursor-on" and "cursor-off"
y in PowerPC machine? Or is it
unnecessary in PowerPC firmware?
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
it will be
passed to all gcc calls by default?
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:19 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 19:53 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> > Changing the load-base worked in the P5 machine but when I tested in the
> > P6 machine I got the following message:
>
test with, etc. I
> had the svn version of 1886.
>
> Many thanks for taking the time to read this,
> Joe
>
>
> ___
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTE
2008-10-23 at 16:00 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> >
> > I talked with some folks at #pppc64 on freenode an they suggest that
> > the
> > OF is loading things in the wrong place could a problem with my
> > load-base:
> >
> > real-base
ed on.
> >
> >
> > I have also installed grub2(v1.96, source compiled by me) as the boot
> > loader.
>
> Hello,
>
> Don't use the 1.96 release from february but trunk SVN version.
> There were many bugfixes since then and I think even in the png module
&
008-10-23 at 16:00 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> >
> > I talked with some folks at #pppc64 on freenode an they suggest that
> > the
> > OF is loading things in the wrong place could a problem with my
> > load-base:
> >
> > real-base
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:52 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Please CC me, since I'm no longer subscribed to grub-devel.
>
> > From: Manoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: The development of GRUB 2
> > Subject: Re: PPC64
> > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:43:25
Hi Hollis,
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 14:32 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:18 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> >
> > I'm working in a project to use grub2 to boot some ppc machines(p6 , p5
> > and so on) and we had some difficulties with a grub modules
; is showed in attachment readelf.txt
If you could help me, I will appreciate it. Thanks in advance!
Best regards.
Abranches, Manoel R.
cursor-on, unknown wordWelcome to GRUB!
search= 0x38f4c
end =0x24098
gap =0x8000
align=0x1000
base_mod=0x2d000
modinfo = 0x2d000
modinfo->magic = 0x3063
modi
46 matches
Mail list logo
