Next week I was going to hunt all the patches I personally missed or had not
been commited yet by someone else. Been so busy lately havn't had time. But
I did commit one of your patches.
1)[PATCH] grub-install message should mention --recheck
This one really isn't necessary. Kind of agreed with t
You guys wouldn't happen to know any good ways to test out EFI through
virtualization. I see some Qemu stuff that is rather old. But I'm not too
trusting of it's funcationality now. I'd like to play around and test/debug
some of the grub2 efi support, without having to buy a Mac. Any ideas?
___
Collin does your java converter need to stay in the repo now that
grub-mkfont is there? Any benefits to it over grub-mkfont?
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:18:15 +0200
> Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>
> > Bean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch
e
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:05:40 -0600
> "Jerone Young" wrote:
>
> > File util/fonttool/src/org/gnu/grub/fonttool/PFF2Loader.java didn't
> > make it into the repository.
> >
> > J
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-12/msg00024.html
It is the attachment.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Jerone Young :
>
> Did anyone have any objections to this patch. Not sure if anyone had any
>> craving to use --build-id. If
Did anyone have any objections to this patch. Not sure if anyone had any
craving to use --build-id. If not I'll check it in in the next week.
Jerone
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Manoel Rebelo Abranches <
mrab...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrot
Committed a variant of this patch into the repository.
Thanks,
Jerone
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
> 2008-12-27 jida...@jidanni.org
>
>* normal/menu.c: print clearer instructions on the screen
>
> --- menuORIG.c 2008-12-
File util/fonttool/src/org/gnu/grub/fonttool/PFF2Loader.java didn't make it
into the repository.
Jerone
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:44:49 -0600
> "Jerone Young" wrote:
>
> > I just paid attention
).
Jerone
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Jerone Young wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I wanted to start up a discussion on building a steady release
> cycle. Many distros are now looking for some stability from Grub 2 as they
> are looking to include it in future releases. I was
Hey guys,
I wanted to start up a discussion on building a steady release
cycle. Many distros are now looking for some stability from Grub 2 as they
are looking to include it in future releases. I was recently at the Ubuntu
Developer Summit in December discussing the possibility of includin
I just paid attention to this (sorry). So everything seems fine. But the
dependency on a proprietary java stack to generate fonts isn't good. Does
it happen to work with gcc java ?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > Well, I don't have time r
I'll track your patches. If everyone comes to a consensus on them in a week
I'll commit them to the repo.
I agree with Pavel also that using "Ctrl-" is more descriptive then
what is there now.
What other patches where you going to submit like this?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 8:09 PM, wrote:
> >>>
Does Linux bios only allow for two serial ports? Are theres ports
addresses hard coded into
Linux BIOS?
I also creating all the machine.h for one ifdef is a little much. But
it may be needed. The
ifdef in serial.c should be changed to
#ifdef GRUB_MACHINE_LINUXBIOS
#else
Also what I don't under
Yes the OS should switch the processor into long mode. You will need
to add this logic to the kernel that you are writing (I'm assuming
that you are, as this logic is already in Linux or FreeBSD).
On 9/30/07, Simon Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it true that GRUB2 multiboot, while
Hollis Blanchard can better answer this but I think I have most the
answers for you..see below.
On 8/29/07, Proneet Biswas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I am fairly new to the grub bootloader. So if the question is already
> answered, please feel free to point me to the relevant pointer
te:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 00:28, Jerone Young wrote:
> > This was no mistake. So here is the thinking here (I figured this
> > would come up). The multiboot heads outside of the grub directory are
> > not grub specific. This gives other operating systems or progr
On 7/30/07, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jerone Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This was no mistake. So here is the thinking here (I figured this
> > would come up). The multiboot heads outside of the grub directory are
> >
them. They mainly contain definitions that are
not just specific to grub, but multiboot.
On 7/25/07, Vesa Jääskeläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jerone Young wrote:
> Added files:
> include: multiboot.h multiboot2.h
> include/grub : multiboot
Just pulled fresh CVS and things do work. What needs to happen is that
need to check in new .mk files. I'll generate new .mk files form the
new .rmk files and all will be well.
Normally when building grub I do:
./autogen <-- to generate the .mk files
./configure
make
So put in the new .mk files
I'll fix this .. something didn't make it in to the grub CVS .. Thanks!
On 7/25/07, Julien Ranc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since last commit to the CVS by Jerone, Grub2 does not compile, at least for
i386-pc target :
The file multiboot.h is expected to be in the include/grub/machine/
direc
CTED]> [070725 11:53]:
> "Jerone Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm going to submit a new patch shortly. I'll also check it in. So it
> > will not suffer from code rot :-) Need to make sure some stuff works
> > on ppc then it'll be
I'm going to submit a new patch shortly. I'll also check it in. So it
will not suffer from code rot :-) Need to make sure some stuff works
on ppc then it'll be in. Probably tonight or tomorrow.
On 7/22/07, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jerone Young&q
Will do the changes for the coding style (good point).
On 7/7/07, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jerone Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -r b85dfdfcce16 conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk
> --- a/conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk Wed Jul 04 15:53:23 200
I think we should leave Grub Legacy GPL v2 and move Grub 2 to GPL v3.
Given Grub Legacy really has had little work on it and most distros
are maintaining their own patches anyway. With little to no work on
Grub Legacy going on anyway, no reason to create work for it :-) . I
see Grub Legacy dieing
rub-install script uses) and it
ran and when through the process just fine. I assume based on this the
grub did install just fine (as it would have errored otherwise).
On 5/27/07, Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At Sat, 26 May 2007 19:44:09 -0500,
Jerone Young wrote:
>
>
em in the past also. What I do need to know is how
you are successfully compiling it . Is your gcc version less then 4.x
?
On 5/26/07, Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At Sat, 26 May 2007 18:14:23 -0500,
Jerone Young wrote:
>
> Are you sure you did this on an x86-64 install.
There are some patches floating around in the world for grub1 to use
TPM. Actually you can find it here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trustedgrub/
It is still being kept up as there was a release this month. This
would be a good project to look at, if you have not already.
On 5/24/07, karmo
Are you sure you did this on an x86-64 install. Current CVS still
suffers from the not being able to properly compile on x86-64 systems.
I am looking into it again now, but I think you may be mistaken in how
you are using it? What distro & gcc version are you using ?
On 5/22/07, Constantine Kouso
This is an obvious problem. Thanks for finding it Pattrick! I will
commit the fix today.
On 4/18/07, Pattrick Hueper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
testing grub2 on a 64bit platform i found an issue in kern/elf.c method
grub_elf64_load.
There are parentheses missing after the compare of re
This may be a bigger problem. Trying CVS, it apears that LVM as the
root device (where grub files are held ../boot is) does not currently
work. Looking more into it now.
On 3/26/07, Juan Pedro Paredes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
grub2+LVM+XEN issues
8<
devel:/boot/grub# cat /boo
I plan to look into this problem this week actually. For some reason
_start is not defined for x86-64 when using -m32. This is needed for
some of the assembly code that is used. Not sure why exactly this is
happening...I just know it's happening :-)
On 4/9/07, James Lockie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
This is fixed in current CVS. It was broken by a patch for nested
menus, but has been fixed.
On 3/21/07, Kirill REDbyte Novikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
Didn't find any info abt this problem in google. After reinstallation of grub
1.97, OS choosing menu simply disappears (on some PCs)
Exactly how do you generate a .mk file from the .rmk files. What is
the ruby command line to do this?
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r cca565f3c398 util/i386/pc/getroot.c
--- a/util/i386/pc/getroot.c Sun Feb 11 09:48:36 2007 -0600
+++ b/util/i386/pc/getroot.c Sun Feb 11 19:02:00 2007 -0600
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ find_root_device (const char *dir, dev_t
strip_extra_sla
ithout issue. Giving
distributions a migration path.
Attached I have changes for i386-pc & powerpc . More then happy to do
the foot work for others to get this integrated.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r d103f4d15eaa ChangeLog
--- a/ChangeLog Thu Mar 15 20:05:02 2007 -0
Are these patches ok? There does not seem to be much activity on the
list. Is anyone still actively maintaining grub2? Whould love to see
this and other patches I've sent to the list to be in cvs.
On 2/17/07, Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a ChangeLo
the problem is "menu" is never
set anywhere.
The calling order is:
grub_normal_execute()
grub_readconfig_file()
grub_env_get_data_slot()
Though I'm very confused of how to exactly fix this with the logic in the patch.
On 2/17/07, Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2/14/07, Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting. I will try this again. I was working with I believe
fedora core 6. I noticed this was happening. It is not a symlink on
fedora core 6. This may have something to do with udev.
I will try it out and get some output from it.
On 2/12/07, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jerone Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to get grub to read from grub.cfg file with the current code in
> CVS appears to be busted. Release 1.95
I've created a ChangeLog entry and have attaced all the patches along
with it in this email.
On 2/14/07, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 07:20, Jerone Young wrote:
> I accidentally sent the wrong changes in the last email. So please
Interesting. I will try this again. I was working with I believe
fedora core 6. I noticed this was happening. It is not a symlink on
fedora core 6. This may have something to do with udev.
On 2/14/07, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 08:42, Jerone
it because it will find /dev/root first (this is a
mistake).
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r cca565f3c398 util/i386/pc/getroot.c
--- a/util/i386/pc/getroot.c Sun Feb 11 09:48:36 2007 -0600
+++ b/util/i386/pc/getroot.c Sun Feb 11 19:02:00 2007 -0600
@@ -192,6 +192,13
I accidentally sent the wrong changes in the last email. So please pay
them no attention. The patches in this email are the right ones.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is a recap of what was in my previous email:
This patch is derived from the patch sent earlier by L
Previous set of patches had a bug with the transformation lines. It
would substitute the libdir, this causes problems when something in
your libdir path matches your subsitution. This set fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r cca565f3c398 Makefile.in
ithout issue. Giving
distributions a migration path.
Attached I have changes for i386-pc & powerpc . More then happy to do
the foot work for others to get this integrated.
All patches are attached.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r cca565f3c398 -r f643e910ecf8 Makefile.i
Trying to get grub to read from grub.cfg file with the current code in
CVS appears to be busted. Release 1.95 works fine and can read the
grub.cfg file without a problem automatically. But with code in CVS it
nolonger reads it automatically (meaning no nice bootup menu), and if
you do read it in
46 matches
Mail list logo
