Re: [PATCH] Fix screen coud be filled with leftover artifacts

2024-10-03 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:23:08 +0400 Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote --- > A regression in grub 2.12 causes the grub screen to become cluttered I just tested. Your patch doesn't fix anything for me! (Note: I'm not GRUB developer, I'm just a user.) Hi. I'm annoyed by screen cluttering

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-27 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
Oops, I meant grub-mkrescue, not grub-mkimage, in this mail. On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:10:30 +0400 Askar Safin wrote --- > So, what about my patch? I will repeat: my patch doesn't remove any existing > use cases and adds new use cases. It enables distros to implement secure > boot in g

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-27 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
So, what about my patch? I will repeat: my patch doesn't remove any existing use cases and adds new use cases. It enables distros to implement secure boot in grub-mkimage. As I already told with examples in my first letter, Linux distros already converged to "EFI", not "efi". Current solution by

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-26 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
Hi, Adrian.   On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 17:56:17 +0400  adrian15sgd  wrote ---  > Well, that needs more detailed explanation. Debian has 4 signed GRUB images ( https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub/-/blob/master/debian/build-efi-images?ref_type=heads ) (I will refer to this file as "build-efi-

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-14 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:38:31 +0400 Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel wrote --- > I was not able to use virtualbox on my project until I put the kernel > also to the ISO fs I think, I suspect this is exactly same behaviour I'm talking about in my first letter. It is behaviour called "G

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-14 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:23:05 +0400 adrian15sgd wrote --- > No, I did not disable the SecureBoot support in Super Grub2 Disk because > of this "efi" to "EFI" supposed problem that you describe. I'm not talking about secure boot support in super grub disk. I'm talking about secure boot

Re: [PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-07 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:53:15 +0400 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote --- > > And main argument: I'm aware of one example when "EFI" is hard-coded in > > signed secure boot GRUB binary. Debian has 4 signed GRUB binaries. All > > they are generated > > here:https://sources.debian.org/s

[PATCH] Change "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue for secure boot

2024-09-06 Thread Askar Safin via Grub-devel
Hi. I propose changing "efi" to "EFI" in grub-mkrescue, because this is needed for secure boot. Please, apply patch below. Here is why. First of all, iso9660 file system is case sensitive from GRUB point of view. I. e. if you have directory named "efi" in iso9660, then GRUB command "ls /EFI" wi