在 2023-06-13星期二的 14:33 +0800，mengqinggang写道：
> LDFLAGS do not affect relocations generation. If just modify LDFLAGS,
> grub still needs to process relaxation relocations.
>
According to you, the no-relax test logic of sparc64 is wrong? So we
still need patch #5 in v2?
> 在 2023/6/13 下午2:22, Xiao
LDFLAGS do not affect relocations generation. If just modify LDFLAGS,
grub still needs to process relaxation relocations.
在 2023/6/13 下午2:22, Xiaotian Wu 写道:
在 2023-06-13星期二的 11:25 +0800，mengqinggang写道：
Is this patch used to check if ld supports --no-relax option?
It need to pass -mno-relax
在 2023-06-13星期二的 11:25 +0800，mengqinggang写道：
> Is this patch used to check if ld supports --no-relax option?
> It need to pass -mno-relax option to as or gcc to disable binutils
> generate relaxation relocations.
>
Check "-mno-relax" and "-Wl,--no-relax" in order, if "-mno-relax" is
valid, then
Is this patch used to check if ld supports --no-relax option?
It need to pass -mno-relax option to as or gcc to disable binutils
generate relaxation relocations.
在 2023/6/13 上午10:37, Xiaotian Wu 写道:
New patch is ready:
https://github.com/loongarch64/grub/commits/dev-master
I need your help t
On 6/13/23 11:25, mengqinggang wrote:
Is this patch used to check if ld supports --no-relax option?
It need to pass -mno-relax option to as or gcc to disable binutils
generate relaxation relocations.
It shouldn't be necessary to disable relaxation that early, because code
before relaxation sh
According to the ACPI specification, in ACPI 2.0 or later, an ACPI-compatible
OS must use the XSDT if present.
So, we should use xsdt_addr instead of rsdt_addr if xsdt_addr is valid.
Signed-off-by: Qiumiao Zhang
---
grub-core/kern/acpi.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 del
According to the ACPI specification, in ACPI 2.0 or later, an ACPI-compatible
OS must use the XSDT if present.
So, we should use xsdt_addr instead of rsdt_addr if xsdt_addr is valid.
Signed-off-by: Qiumiao Zhang
---
Changes since v2:
* update the commit message
Qiumiao
---
grub-core/commands/
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Qiumiao Zhang via Grub-devel wrote:
>> According to the UEFI specification, in ACPI 2.0 or later, an
>> ACPI-compatible OS must use the XSDT if present.
> Sorry, I cannot find this in the UEFI spec. Though something more generic is
> in the ACPI spec. Co
New patch is ready:
https://github.com/loongarch64/grub/commits/dev-master
I need your help to confirm that binutils-2.40 and binutils-dev code
have the same behavior when using compile options, thanks.
在 2023-06-12星期一的 06:35 +0800，Xi Ruoyao via Grub-devel写道：
> On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 15:34 +0800,
Le 12/06/2023 à 21:05, Daniel Kiper a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:19:53PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel on Tue, 2023/05/23 17:31:
Now that GCC can generate function calls using the correct calling
convention for us, we can stop using the efi_call_XX () wrappers, and
just
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:19:53PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel on Tue, 2023/05/23 17:31:
> > Now that GCC can generate function calls using the correct calling
> > convention for us, we can stop using the efi_call_XX () wrappers, and
> > just dereference the function pointers di
Ard Biesheuvel on Tue, 2023/05/23 17:31:
> Now that GCC can generate function calls using the correct calling
> convention for us, we can stop using the efi_call_XX () wrappers, and
> just dereference the function pointers directly.
>
> This avoids the untyped variadic wrapper routines, which mea
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:48:39AM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Debugging GRUB can be tricky and require arcane knowledge. This will
> help those unfamiliar with the process to get started debugging GRUB
> with less effort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Washburn
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper
Thank you
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:33:35PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:39:24PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:02:31AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 10:27 AM Julian Andres Klode
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 0
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:26:44PM +0100, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi Li,,
>
> LGTM!
>
> Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper
Thank you for fixing these issues!
Daniel
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Qiumiao Zhang via Grub-devel wrote:
> According to the UEFI specification, in ACPI 2.0 or later, an ACPI-compatible
> OS must use the XSDT if present.
Sorry, I cannot find this in the UEFI spec. Though something more
generic is in the ACPI spec. Could you
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:20:41PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 14:54 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> > On 6/12/23 11:09, Xiaotian Wu wrote:
> > > 在 2023-06-12星期一的 06:35 +0800，Xi Ruoyao via Grub-devel写道：
> > > > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 15:34 +0800, Xiaotian Wu wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Xiaotian Wu wrote:
> Because the binutils of the loongarch architecture adds relaxation support
> [1], the next version of binutils will not be able to build grub.
>
> So we added the R_LARCH_B16, R_LARCH_B21 and R_LARCH_RELAX relocations to
> enhance gru
On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 14:54 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> On 6/12/23 11:09, Xiaotian Wu wrote:
> > 在 2023-06-12星期一的 06:35 +0800，Xi Ruoyao via Grub-devel写道：
> > > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 15:34 +0800, Xiaotian Wu wrote:
> > > > Because the binutils of the loongarch architecture adds relaxation
> > > > su
19 matches
Mail list logo
