Re: GRUB 2.06~rc1 released

2021-03-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 3/12/21 5:25 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote: Hi Bruce, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:30:01 -0600 Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 3/12/21 1:57 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: Hi all, The GRUB maintainers are proud to announce the GRUB 2.06~rc1 that has been just released. Congratulations. For LFS, we do a very simpl

Re: GRUB 2.06~rc1 released

2021-03-12 Thread Glenn Washburn
Hi Bruce, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:30:01 -0600 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 3/12/21 1:57 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The GRUB maintainers are proud to announce the GRUB 2.06~rc1 that > > has been just released. > > Congratulations. > > For LFS, we do a very simple build in a sparse e

Re: GRUB 2.06~rc1 released

2021-03-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 3/12/21 1:57 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: Hi all, The GRUB maintainers are proud to announce the GRUB 2.06~rc1 that has been just released. Congratulations. For LFS, we do a very simple build in a sparse environment. Here are a few observations. We use: ./configure --prefix=/usr \

Re: GRUB 2.06~rc1 released

2021-03-12 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Erwin, can you upload new pot file please? Le ven. 12 mars 2021 à 21:02, Daniel Kiper a écrit : > Hi all, > > The GRUB maintainers are proud to announce the GRUB 2.06~rc1 that has > been just released. > > We would like to thank all the people who have contributed to the project. > > The tarball

GRUB 2.06~rc1 released

2021-03-12 Thread Daniel Kiper
Hi all, The GRUB maintainers are proud to announce the GRUB 2.06~rc1 that has been just released. We would like to thank all the people who have contributed to the project. The tarball is available at https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.06~rc1.tar.xz and its signature at https://alpha.gnu.org/

[PATCH] minix: avoid mistakenly probing ext2 filesystems

2021-03-12 Thread Derek Foreman
From: Daniel Drake ext2 (and ext3, ext4) filesystems write the number of free inodes to location 0x410. On a minix filesystem, that same location is used for the minix superblock magic number. If the number of free inodes on an ext2 filesystem is equal to any of the four minix superblock magic

Re: i386/biosdisk - int 13h/service 48h response buffer issue?

2021-03-12 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Please try to print/save arguments and results as close to the calling site as reasonable. Maybe Linux passes some other argument differently Le ven. 12 mars 2021 à 19:00, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko < phco...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Most likely the issue is the BIOS giving wrong values. It's in

Re: i386/biosdisk - int 13h/service 48h response buffer issue?

2021-03-12 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Most likely the issue is the BIOS giving wrong values. It's interesting that you get different values from Linux BIOS info but my guess is that Linux corrects wrong BIOS data by comparing with data reported by native driver. This being said If like to be proven wrong. I would modify Linux to save a

[PATCH] arm/efi: fix ram base detection

2021-03-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé via Grub-devel
On 32b Arm platforms, grub allocates memory for the initrd in the first 512MB of DRAM. To do so, the grub_efi_get_ram_base() function will be called to compute the DRAM base. Currently this function returns the lowest start address of all memory regions with attribute write-back. However, if for e

Re: i386/biosdisk - int 13h/service 48h response buffer issue?

2021-03-12 Thread Guilherme Piccoli
Hi GRUB community, do we have any news about this one? Appreciate any advice. Cheers, Guilherme ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Re: Dell BIOS issue reading Disk Extended data

2021-03-12 Thread Guilherme Piccoli
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:41 PM Limonciello, Mario wrote: > > > > > Hello Dell folks, I'm Guilherme Piccoli from Canonical - first of all, > > apologies for the out-of-nowhere communication. We've been investigating > > an issue that seems to date long time ago, and eventually we could > > narrow