Linux loader EFI handover (was: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1])

2016-03-09 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
09.03.2016 18:18, Matt Fleming пишет: > On Tue, 08 Mar, at 07:57:35AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: - 64-bit kernel on 32-bit platform like Baytrail can't work >> >> Do you mean "32 bit EFI"? If yes, why is it a problem? > > The biggest issue is that there's no way right now for a boot loader > to

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:51:42PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > I will go through most of my mails tomorrow. I'm inclined to include > multiboot2 extensions but had few comments about patch style No problem. Thanks a lot! Daniel ___ Gr

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Matt Fleming
On Tue, 08 Mar, at 07:57:35AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >> - 64-bit kernel on 32-bit platform like Baytrail can't work > > Do you mean "32 bit EFI"? If yes, why is it a problem? The biggest issue is that there's no way right now for a boot loader to tell the kernel that it needs to use a transla

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
I will go through most of my mails tomorrow. I'm inclined to include multiboot2 extensions but had few comments about patch style Le mer. 9 mars 2016 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:24:49PM +010

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi

2016-03-09 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 08/03/2016 23:37, Fu Wei wrote: On 8 March 2016 at 14:54, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: So speaking of loading additional modules/lack of initrd on ARM, I thinks that will (only) affect loading XSM. For this, I have discussed of that with Julien, I think : (1) the first module must be kernel (

Re: [GRUB2 PATCH v3 0/4] multiboot2: Add two extensions

2016-03-09 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series: > - enables EFI boot services usage in loaded images > by multiboot2 protocol, > - add support for multiboot2 protocol compatible > relocatable images. > > Earlier versions of this patch series ar

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > would it be possible to get "grub-xen: support booting huge pv-domains" > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2016-03/msg00071.html) > patch series into grub2 2.02? Andrei, Vladimir, what do you think about

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:24:49PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs > > that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with pla

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi

2016-03-09 Thread Fu Wei
Hi Julien, On 9 March 2016 at 15:10, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/03/2016 23:37, Fu Wei wrote: >> >> On 8 March 2016 at 14:54, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> So speaking of loading additional modules/lack of initrd on ARM, I thinks >> that >> will (only) affect loading XSM. >> For this, I hav

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Michael Chang wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> >> > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week >> > time, >> > so that we can have a reas

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

2016-03-09 Thread Michael Chang
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week > > time, > > so that we can have a reasonable timeline > > Did anyone took the time to fix btrfs su