> -Original Message-
> From: grub-devel-bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel-
> bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir 'f-
> coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:08 AM
> To: The development of GNU GRUB
> Subject: Re: grub causing NVDIM
28.11.2015 08:25, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) пишет:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: grub-devel-bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel-
>> bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Andrei Borzenkov
>> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 11:56 AM
>> To: The development
> -Original Message-
> From: grub-devel-bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel-
> bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Andrei Borzenkov
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 11:56 AM
> To: The development of GNU GRUB ;
> vkuzn...@redhat.com; de...@microsoft.com; pjo...@redh
26.11.2014 11:59, Laszlo Ersek пишет:
> HyperV Gen2 virtual machines have no PIT; guest code should rely on UEFI
> services instead.
>
Could you retest with current master? It now supports multiple methods
to calibrate TSC and should avoid PIT on UEFI systems.
__
27.11.2015 16:55, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> New version attached
>
For completeness, there is lsmmap, but it is cosmetic.
What about multiboot(2)? It lists possible memory types. Do they
constitute binding API?
#define MULTIBOOT_MEMORY_AVAILABLE 1
#define MULTI
> I would add:
> * hex. To print and store in hex form
> * utf16. Decode utf16 into utf8. utf16 is a common encoding in EFI land.
hex is already part of the latest proposed patch:
>> +case EFI_VAR_HEX:
I'm not sure whether utf16 will be useful, as all standard UEFI
variables now are using ASC
On 14.11.2015 05:03, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 13.11.2015 22:42, Ignat Korchagin пишет:
> +static enum efi_var_type
> +parse_efi_var_type (const char *type)
> +{
> + if (!grub_strncmp (type, "string", sizeof("string")))
> +return EFI_VAR_STRING;
> +
I thi
New version attached
>> GRUB_MEMORY_COREBOOT_TABLES = 16,
>> GRUB_MEMORY_CODE = 20,
>> /* This one is special: it's used internally but is never reported
> Note (b): The internal GRUB_MEMORY_CODE (20) value is
> leaking through to the E820 table.
>
> That appears to
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> What about this patch for the passing of pram?
It is incomplete. You need to handle make_efi_memtype() as well as
efiemu where I am not sure what is the right thing to do (and we
probably have zero chance to test it i
Andrei, could you please commit this patch?
On 15.11.2015 07:26, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 14.11.2015 19:22, Peter Cheung пишет:
>> hi
>> my flex in mac is installed using macports.
>>
>> $flex --version
>> flex 2.5.35 Apple(flex-31)
>>
>> And the line in configure fail
>>
>> version=`$LEX --ve
What about this patch for the passing of pram?
diff --git a/grub-core/mmap/efi/mmap.c b/grub-core/mmap/efi/mmap.c
index 900a4d6..0c03c5d 100644
--- a/grub-core/mmap/efi/mmap.c
+++ b/grub-core/mmap/efi/mmap.c
@@ -118,6 +118,12 @@ grub_efi_mmap_iterate (grub_memory_hook_t hook,
void *hook_data,
11 matches
Mail list logo