On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Bean wrote:
> Thanks for the info, I don't have any 4K drive to test. You can check
> if ntfs fs driver is working properly since I don't remember if I have
> made the 1024 MFT assumption elsewhere.
I don't know yet when I will have the time to test it because the
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Thomas Frauendorfer
wrote:
> When I formated a disk with 4K sectors in Windows it used a complete
> sector for each MFT record. The block size is not relevant for the MFT
> record size, but the sector size of the disk is.
Thanks for the info, I don't have an
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Wed 25 Apr 2012 01:57:54 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 25.04.2012 01:52, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > +grub_util_error (_("Could not open path `%s'"), path);
> This one should be unified with other similar messages.
Err, in the file I can see various ways: "Una
I am interested in getting UEFI/PXE working using the EFI IP/TFTP
stack as hacked versions of grub-legacy (e,g., Fedora 17). Is there
any wisdom that the list would like to shed?
1. ON EFI platforms grub-legacy directly uses the EFI TFTP stack and
not its own i386-pc/TFTP stack.
Network tftp-able
On 25.04.2012 01:52, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> +grub_util_error (_("Could not open path `%s'"), path);
This one should be unified with other similar messages. It would also
have advantage of giving strerror. strerror should be given on all lib
errors.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serb
Here is an updated patch.
Samuel
=== modified file 'util/getroot.c'
--- util/getroot.c 2012-04-22 19:02:55 +
+++ util/getroot.c 2012-04-25 01:41:04 +
@@ -700,6 +700,69 @@
#elif defined (__GNU__)
+static char *
+find_hurd_root_device (const char *path)
+{
+ file_t file;
+ e
On 25.04.2012 00:39, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Wed 25 Apr 2012 00:31:26 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 25.04.2012 00:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 22:14:33 +0200, a
>>> écrit :
On 24.04.2012 19:13,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Wed 25 Apr 2012 00:31:26 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 25.04.2012 00:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 22:14:33 +0200, a
> > écrit :
> >> On 24.04.2012 19:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/ph
On 25.04.2012 00:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 22:14:33 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 24.04.2012 19:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 15:19:25 +0200, a
>>> écrit :
On 24.04.2012 14:42,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 22:14:33 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 19:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 15:19:25 +0200, a
> > écrit :
> >> On 24.04.2012 14:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>> 0-sized indeed poses
On 24.04.2012 19:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 15:19:25 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 24.04.2012 14:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:55:33 +0200, a
>>> écrit :
They have iso9660 spa
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 15:19:25 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 14:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:55:33 +0200, a
> > écrit :
> >> They have iso9660 spanning through
> >> the whole disk but all of the
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2, Previous version doesn't return blocklist information for small
> files embed in MFT, this patch fixes it. For example, create a
> 512-byte file test in ntfs and try this command:
>
> grub-fstest /ntfs.img blocklist /tes
On 24.04.2012 14:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:55:33 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> One could have hd0s1 containing hd0s5 and hd0s6.
> Argl, I forgot that case indeed. It's funny how that contracts the very
> word "partition"...
>
>> In this case
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:55:33 +0200, a
écrit :
> One could have hd0s1 containing hd0s5 and hd0s6.
Argl, I forgot that case indeed. It's funny how that contracts the very
word "partition"...
> In this case we want hd0s5 and not hd0s1. On the other hand a file
On 24.04.2012 11:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Because path_start is the start of the file, not of the partition
> containing the file.
>
>> > Some partitions may contain more partitions, like logical container
>> > contains logical partitions.
> Yes, but we do not have defined /dev namings for thes
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:44:35 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 11:38, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:36:27 +0200, a écrit :
> >> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:26:46 +0200,
> >> a écrit :
> >>> T
On 24.04.2012 11:38, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:36:27 +0200, a écrit :
>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:26:46 +0200, a
>> écrit :
>>> Theoretically you shouldn't stop until you find the partition if you
>>> know that your device i
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:36:27 +0200, a écrit :
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:26:46 +0200, a
> écrit :
> > Theoretically you shouldn't stop until you find the partition if you
> > know that your device is partition
>
> What do you precisely mean by "
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:26:46 +0200, a
écrit :
> Theoretically you shouldn't stop until you find the partition if you
> know that your device is partition
What do you precisely mean by "device"?
What we don't know is whether the root storage for the file is
p
On 24.04.2012 11:16, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:12:11 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 24.04.2012 11:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 10:55:21 +0200, a
>>> écrit :
On 24.04.2012 01:34,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:04:46 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > +/* Retrieve the storage information for PATH, and search which partitions
> > + * contains its start. */
> > +static char *
> > +find_hurd_root_device (const char
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:12:11 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 11:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 10:55:21 +0200, a
> > écrit :
> >> On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>> + if (errno == ENO
On 24.04.2012 11:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 10:55:21 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> + if (errno == ENOENT && part >= 5)
>>> + {
>> This introduces an assumption that if part >=5 is missing
On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> +/* Retrieve the storage information for PATH, and search which partitions
> + * contains its start. */
> +static char *
> +find_hurd_root_device (const char *path)
> +{
> + struct store *path_store, *part_store;
> + char *devpath = NULL;
> + const
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 10:55:21 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > + if (errno == ENOENT && part >= 5)
> > + {
> This introduces an assumption that if part >=5 is missing then there are
> no additional partitions. While t
On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> + if (errno == ENOENT && part >= 5)
> + {
This introduces an assumption that if part >=5 is missing then there are
no additional partitions. While this is true for msdos, it's false for
GPT, where such config is common after deleting a par
27 matches
Mail list logo
