Re: [PATCH] Support * as field width or precision in printf

2011-05-05 Thread Josh Triplett
Just following up on these patches. Any obstacles to merging them? Anything I need to fix in them? Thanks, Josh Triplett ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Re: [PATCH] MINIX file system version 3 support

2011-05-05 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 06.05.2011 01:34, Feiran Zheng wrote: > 2011/5/6 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko : >> On 06.05.2011 00:59, Feiran Zheng wrote: >>> Hi Vladimir, >>> >>> What's the status of minix3 fs patch now, please? Anything else I can do? >>> >> it's to be applied after 1.99 is released. Does grub comp

Re: [PATCH] MINIX file system version 3 support

2011-05-05 Thread Feiran Zheng
2011/5/6 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko : > On 06.05.2011 00:59, Feiran Zheng wrote: >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> What's the status of minix3 fs patch now, please? Anything else I can do? >> > it's to be applied after 1.99 is released. Does grub compiles and works > well under minix? OK, thanks. A

Re: [PATCH] MINIX file system version 3 support

2011-05-05 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 06.05.2011 00:59, Feiran Zheng wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > What's the status of minix3 fs patch now, please? Anything else I can do? > it's to be applied after 1.99 is released. Does grub compiles and works well under minix? >>> I've cleaned it up. Could you test it and point me as to where I can

Re: [PATCH] MINIX file system version 3 support

2011-05-05 Thread Feiran Zheng
Hi Vladimir, What's the status of minix3 fs patch now, please? Anything else I can do? >> I've cleaned it up. Could you test it and point me as to where I can get >> an minix3 image for my own tests? -- Best regards! Fam Zheng ___ Grub-devel mailing

Re: Raid5 regression

2011-05-05 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Phillip Susi writes: > On 5/4/2011 4:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> Ideally by using 1.1 metadata. It's in the end of the device but >> contains enough data to unambigously tell if it belongs to disk or >> partition. > > You mean 1.0? I guess I'll have to try that. I ju

Re: Raid5 regression

2011-05-05 Thread Phillip Susi
On 5/4/2011 4:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: Ideally by using 1.1 metadata. It's in the end of the device but contains enough data to unambigously tell if it belongs to disk or partition. You mean 1.0? I guess I'll have to try that. ___