On 09/21/2010 09:42 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
# file /tmp/sda3.mbr /tmp/sda3.mbr: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified
Bootloader, stage1 version 0x3, 1st sector stage2 0xdd29b38;
partition 1: ID=0x83, starthead 239, startsector 63, 35153937
sectors, extended partition table (last)\011, code offset 0x
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:29:35PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I see my mistake of output file in my previous mail, it should read /dev/sda3
> instead
> of /tmp/sda3, right?
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda3 bs=512 count=1
Right.
--
Len Sorensen
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:18 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
> > So the solution is to blank out the first sector of /dev/sda3,
> >
> > dd if=/dev/null of=/tmp/sda3 bs=512 count=1
> >
> > to get rid of the warnings? Please confirm the command above is correct.
>
> Not quite.
>
> dd if=/dev/
On 09/21/10 09:13, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 09/21/10 03:31, Svante Signell wrote:
I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
only grub-devel.
Then subscribe to help-grub! It's not hard to do, and that list gets
less email than grub-devel these days so you shouldn't
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 09/15/2010 07:58 AM, Aleš Nesrsta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did not find configuration of USB serial device, so I made this small
> > patch.
> >
> >
> Go ahead for trunk
Done (trunk revision 2843).
(I had to do it two times - unfortunately there
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:42:14PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Yes, if I remember correctly, that's what I did some time ago, when
> installing a new disk for /home.
>
> > If so, then there is a chance that the first sector of sda3 contains
> > the old extended partition table, and grub probe m
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:54 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
> Is there any chance you used to have an extended partition as sda3 and
> then made a linux partition which is now sda3 and your new extended
> partition is sda4?
Ye
Here's a patch to re-enable grub-extras by allowing extra modules to
provide Autogen definitions files. A few things to note:
* I had to have autogen.sh create 'contrib' symlinks in the source
tree, as Automake got hopelessly confused when I had $(GRUB_CONTRIB)
in source file names - au
On 09/21/2010 16:54, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
What does improperly nested mean: overlapping, or something else?
How to resolve this problem? According to fdisk the sda1 and sda3 partitions
are _not_ overlapping:
Additionally, does the same warning have to be repeated so many times for every
ke
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:11:08PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 19:08, Colin Watson wrote:
> > All fixed, and I've tested an out-of-tree build of x86-64_efi now.
> > Please try revision 2839.
>
> Again the build (rev 2839) fails, but this time not due to gnulib
Keshav test
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
> only grub-devel.
>
> Can somebody please help me with the following problem:
> (I have asked on Debian lists, and also filed a bug #594158 but no
> response
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 19:08, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> All fixed, and I've tested an out-of-tree build of x86-64_efi now.
> Please try revision 2839.
>
Again the build (rev 2839) fails, but this time not due to gnulib
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../grub-core -I.. -Wall -W
-I../../include -I../
On 09/21/2010 09:31, Svante Signell wrote:
When installing a new kernel or a new version of grub I get a
warning that /dev/sda1 (windows rescue) and /dev/sda3 (linux root /)
are improperly nested: /usr/sbin/grub-probe: warn: Discarding
improperly nested partition (hd1,msdos3,msdos1).
Assuming
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:32:35PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> gcc -E -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -W -I./include -DGRUB_UTIL=1
> -DGRUB_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/grub\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"
> -DGRUB_MACHINE_EFI=1 -DGRUB_MACHINE=X86_64_EFI
> -DGRUB_FILE=\"grub_script.tab.h\" -I. -I.. -I. -I
On 09/21/10 03:31, Svante Signell wrote:
I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
only grub-devel.
Then subscribe to help-grub! It's not hard to do, and that list gets
less email than grub-devel these days so you shouldn't be overwhelmed
with email...
__
Le 21/09/2010 13:02, KESHAV P.R. a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:43, Yves Blusseau wrote:
Le 21/09/2010 10:38, KESHAV P.R. a écrit :
Grub2 bzr mainline rev 2830 does not compile for both x86_64-efi and
i386-pc. Seems like some error due to gnulib. I have attached the
output while compi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:43, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/09/2010 10:38, KESHAV P.R. a écrit :
>>
>> Grub2 bzr mainline rev 2830 does not compile for both x86_64-efi and
>> i386-pc. Seems like some error due to gnulib. I have attached the
>> output while compiling for x86_64-efi.
>
> One inc
Le 21/09/2010 10:38, KESHAV P.R. a écrit :
Grub2 bzr mainline rev 2830 does not compile for both x86_64-efi and
i386-pc. Seems like some error due to gnulib. I have attached the
output while compiling for x86_64-efi.
One include what wrong. Corrected in revision 2835.
Regards,
Yves Blusseau
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:08:58PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> Grub2 bzr mainline rev 2830 does not compile for both x86_64-efi and
> i386-pc. Seems like some error due to gnulib. I have attached the
> output while compiling for x86_64-efi.
[...]
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/home/keshav_pr/De
Yes,
I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
only grub-devel.
Can somebody please help me with the following problem:
(I have asked on Debian lists, and also filed a bug #594158 but no
response so far).
When installing a new kernel or a new version of grub I get
20 matches
Mail list logo
