forgot the files. Sorry,
Tibor/dev/md127:
Version : imsm
Raid Level : container
Total Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
UUID : 46a4fc60:21554de1:1edfad0f:c137ddac
Member Arrays :
Number Major Minor RaidDevice
0 80-/d
Thanks for your help. Please see my further questions below.
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Felix Zielcke wrote:
From: Felix Zielcke fziel...@z-51.de
You're problem is that you're using metadata 1.x and not the older
default 0.90. Which we don't support yet.
In my understanding the superblock of the
Hi,
This the new version of the patch adding grub-probe (and grub-setup)
support for NetBSD. The main changes are:
- in function grub_util_biosdisk_get_grub_dev(), merge of the new
NetBSD code with the original Linux code.
- re-enabled disk size detection for floppy. This is done as for t
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
As long as the script complains appropiately and exits non-zero if gettext
was installed, I would consider it robust (keep in mind grub.cfg isn't
^^^
I meant "wasn't" of course.
Ok, here is the new patch.
Hi,
I've removed loader/efi/appleloader.c, because it contained blobs of
binary data. If someone can provide a satisfactory explanation for
them, it can be added back. However, this command seems to be seldom
needed.
Please keep in mind binary blobs or other kind of obfuscated data is not
acce
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 05:46:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:37:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > 2010-01-02 Colin Watson
> >
> > * include/grub/misc.h (GNUC_PREREQ): New macro.
> > (ATTRIBUTE_ERROR): New macro.
> > * include/grub/list.h (gru
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:21:21PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Instead of this, why not only use the attribute if it's available? I
> > couldn't find an entry about it in GCC's human-readable change
> > summaries, but support was committed on 2007-
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> As long as the script complains appropiately and exits non-zero if gettext
> was installed, I would consider it robust (keep in mind grub.cfg isn't
^^^
I meant "wasn't" of course.
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 03:54:49AM +0100, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why there is no check for device type (block/character) in
> grub-setup.c whereas the function probe() in grub-probe.c exits with
> error if the device is not of the expected type. Shouldn't there be a
> s
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:05:53PM +0100, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> You mean with an AC_PATH_PROG(GETTEXTBIN, gettext, echo) and substitute
> GETTEXTBIN in 10_linux?
Yes.
> But, in order to have a robust configuration script, it would still be
> desirable to check in 10_linux whether @GETTEXTBI
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:21:21PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> > Instead of this, why not only use the attribute if it's available? I
> > couldn't find an entry about it in GCC's human-readable change
> > summaries, but support was committed on 2007-09-23 so I think it's
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:37:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> 2010-01-02 Colin Watson
>
> * include/grub/misc.h (GNUC_PREREQ): New macro.
> (ATTRIBUTE_ERROR): New macro.
> * include/grub/list.h (grub_bad_type_cast_real): Use
> ATTRIBUTE_ERROR.
Looks fine. Pl
Robert Millan wrote:
In this case color_info is defined as following:
I'd appreciate if a native English speaker confirms this, but I believe
this should say "as follows" (same for the other instances of this
construct).
"as follows" reads naturally to me, as a native speaker (also checked:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 12:35:44PM +0100, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>> Can you avoid code duplication here? Something like:
>>
>> #ifdef __NetBSD__
>> const char *template = "%s/r%s";
>> #else
>> const char *template = "%s/%s";
>> #endif
>
> Indeed, it's better. But we also need a variable for th
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:57:08AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I thought about it, but I really don't have much experience writing for
> autotools. AFAICT, it would require getting rid of all the ruby and
> gen*.sh scripts and generally be very invasive.
Well, yes. But it's something we ca
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:43:52AM -0500, Bruce O. Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > > This is the typical problem of contributing complaints vs. code.
> >
> > Bruce, there's absolutely no problem with Vladimir helping with review of
> > code, documentatio
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> I followed your suggestions. I attach new draft together with drawing of
> a blue diagonal line in example kernel (it would be way better to make
> it use it for output but it's intended to just show how to us
FYI:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/wraplinux/
It seems that Linux can be made Multiboot-compliant now. Anyone has time to
investigate this?
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi
___
Grub-devel ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
