On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 11:59 +0800, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If we decide so, we go back to option 1 (my original
> implementation).
> > Because the backup file format is not important any more as it is
> > totally transparent to the restorers. Am I right?
>
> Another option would be to st
2009/12/29 Bruce Dubbs
> Bruce O. Benson wrote:
>
> I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the
structure below. I also did some research and propose a different
layout, also shown below.
>>>
>> The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here:
>>
Bruce O. Benson wrote:
I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the
structure below. I also did some research and propose a different
layout, also shown below.
The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here:
http://grub.enbug.org/Manual
From one Bruce to an
2009/12/3 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> >
> > I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the
> > structure below. I also did some research and propose a different
> > layout, also shown below.
>
The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here:
http://gru
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bean wrote:
> But no worry, I've created a fork project BURG that contains some
> brand-new features, the LUA engine will be added back soon.
>
Is there a URL for BURG yet?
As soon as I see a bootloader that uses Lua as its scripting/config engine,
I'm switching
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Zhu Yi wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 06:04 +0800, Isaac Dupree wrote:
>> > Option 1~3 requires the recover has the knowledge of the backup file
>> > format somehow, but a simple dd is enough for option 4. What do you
>> > think?
>>
>> If the partitioning had been
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:20:21AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.12.2009, 00:05 -0600 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
On the other hand, config.guess is used to get build_cpu and build_os
and I don't see that being used at all right now by grub.
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 06:04 +0800, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> > Option 1~3 requires the recover has the knowledge of the backup file
> > format somehow, but a simple dd is enough for option 4. What do you
> > think?
>
> If the partitioning had been changed in the mean time, 4 would overwrite
> it with
Hi,
Here is a new version of the patch (the change log remains the same as
in the original email). The new version does not attempt to read from a
floppy device in grub_util_biosdisk_open. Indeed, on NetBSD, reading
from the floppy device (e.g. cat /dev/fd0a) takes a _long_ time to abort
wh
Zhu Yi wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-25 at 05:21 +0800, Robert Millan wrote:
I think making a backup is a fine idea, but I'd rather avoid the "option
creep". It doesn't hurt to simply dump the files in /boot/grub/. If user
later discovers that valuable data was overwritten, she can figure out
how to
Hi,
On Dec/28/2009, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> This patch should fix a small problem that Vladimir spotted and
Committed.
--
Carles Pina i Estany
http://pinux.info
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
=== modified file 'commands/search.c'
--- commands/search.c 2009-12-25 23:50:59 +
+++ commands/search.c 2009-12-28 13:02:23 +
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
#include
void
-FUNC_NAME (const char *key, const char *var, int no_floppy)
+FUNC_NAME (con
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 05:37:11PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> Hello. I'm implementing video part of multiboot specification.
>> Currently the only defined interface is for providing VBE info. I
>> propose following way to set fields if video is non VB
Am Sonntag, den 27.12.2009, 17:50 -0800 schrieb Lapohos Tibor:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> What the OROM says is that both of my volumes are bootable.
> /dev/md126 corresponds to Volume0, and its first partition (ext4) has
> the boot flag set.
>
> My problem is that I cannot get grub2 install
14 matches
Mail list logo
