Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Bean
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > hello > > 2009/9/9 Bean : >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >>> 2009/9/8 Bean : Hi, After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following component structure: frame - window bord

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Michal Suchanek
hello 2009/9/9 Bean : > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> 2009/9/8 Bean : >>> Hi, >>> >>> After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following >>> component structure: >>> >>> frame - window border >>> panel - layout manager with scroll bar support >>> window - fra

Re: PXEgrub development on grub2

2009-09-09 Thread Seth Goldberg
Quoting Michal Suchanek, who wrote the following on Wed, 9 Sep 2009: HEllo 2009/9/9 Felix Zielcke : Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 17:07 +0300 schrieb Lars Nooden: I see that all new work is on Grub2.  What timeline is there for bringing the pxegrub functionality forward to grub2 from legacy

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Bean
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2009/9/8 Bean : >> Hi, >> >> After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following >> component structure: >> >> frame - window border >> panel - layout manager with scroll bar support >> window - frame + panel >> label - text >> ima

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Bean
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2009/9/8 Bean : >> Hi, >> >> After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following >> component structure: >> >> frame - window border >> panel - layout manager with scroll bar support >> window - frame + panel > > What has window tha

Re: PXEgrub development on grub2

2009-09-09 Thread Michal Suchanek
HEllo 2009/9/9 Felix Zielcke : > Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 17:07 +0300 schrieb Lars Nooden: >> I see that all new work is on Grub2.  What timeline is there for >> bringing the pxegrub functionality forward to grub2 from legacy grub? >> >> Regards >> -Lars >> > > I don't know what pxegrub can do

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/9/8 Bean : > Hi, > > After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following > component structure: > > frame - window border > panel - layout manager with scroll bar support > window - frame + panel > label - text > image - image > button - button > list - list box > edit - multi-line e

Re: PXEgrub development on grub2

2009-09-09 Thread Lars Nooden
Felix Zielcke wrote: > I don't know what pxegrub can do, but GRUB 2 has PXE support: > http://grub.enbug.org/PXEBOOT I think that's what I was looking for. I'll play with it. Thanks! Regards, -Lars ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org htt

Re: PXEgrub development on grub2

2009-09-09 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 17:07 +0300 schrieb Lars Nooden: > I see that all new work is on Grub2. What timeline is there for > bringing the pxegrub functionality forward to grub2 from legacy grub? > > Regards > -Lars > I don't know what pxegrub can do, but GRUB 2 has PXE support: http://grub

PXEgrub development on grub2

2009-09-09 Thread Lars Nooden
I see that all new work is on Grub2. What timeline is there for bringing the pxegrub functionality forward to grub2 from legacy grub? Regards -Lars ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Re: install-sh and docs/mdate-sh

2009-09-09 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 15:57 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Is there any reason why we have install-sh and docs/mdate-sh? > We don't use them anywhere and they're shipped with automake, which > Okuji doestn't like anyway IIRC > Oh I didn't notice configure even checks for install-sh. But wh

install-sh and docs/mdate-sh

2009-09-09 Thread Felix Zielcke
Is there any reason why we have install-sh and docs/mdate-sh? We don't use them anywhere and they're shipped with automake, which Okuji doestn't like anyway IIRC -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org

Re: Changes in device-mapper and LVM2 that can affect grub's functionality

2009-09-09 Thread Peter Rajnoha
On 09/09/2009 12:26 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > What's the point in having the /dev/dm-X devices at all? > Does anything use them? ...nothing uses them and nothing ever should! These names are not stable (the number depends on the activation sequence of those devices). Not usable for anything, real

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (second draft)

2009-09-09 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/9/8 Bean : > Hi, > > After more consideration, perhaps we should use the following > component structure: > > frame - window border > panel - layout manager with scroll bar support > window - frame + panel What has window that frame+panel does no have? I think it is reasonable to just put tw

Re: Changes in device-mapper and LVM2 that can affect grub's functionality

2009-09-09 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Peter Rajnoha: > Hi, > > (I'm speaking for the LVM/DM team) > > we have integrated official udev support for device-mapper/LVM > devices lately which is now part of upstream LVM release (however > it's still turned off in default configuration). Th

Changes in device-mapper and LVM2 that can affect grub's functionality

2009-09-09 Thread Peter Rajnoha
Hi, (I'm speaking for the LVM/DM team) we have integrated official udev support for device-mapper/LVM devices lately which is now part of upstream LVM release (however it's still turned off in default configuration). This includes our own udev rules responsible for creating /dev nodes and associa