On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>>> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
>>> Wouldn't it be better to use 4
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:17:34PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok here's now a patch.
> > > Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
> >
> > For 1.97 I
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Le 6 sept. 09 à 16:54, Robert Millan a écrit :
>
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:55:41AM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 5 sept. 09 à 22:31, Robert Millan a écrit :
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Michal
Le 6 sept. 09 à 16:54, Robert Millan a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:55:41AM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
Le 5 sept. 09 à 22:31, Robert Millan a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Still the time and space required to build GCC is much larger than
Hi,
When compiling GRUB with GCC 3.4.3, I had the problem that my modules
didn't work, apparently because the symbols grub_mod_init and
grub_mod_fini weren't in the modules' symbol tables.
Does the absence of these symbols indicate a bug in GCC, or does
"__attribute__ ((used))" not in fact guaran
I think we shouldn't tell users to type `help' if the command doestn't
exist in rescue mode, i.e. minicmd isn't included in core.img
This increases the size of kernel.img for me by 28 bytes. I think it's
worth.
It's so small I don't bother to attach it:
2009-09-06 Felix Zielcke
* kern
Le 6 sept. 09 à 19:17, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit :
checking whether target compiler is working... no
configure: error: cannot compile for the target
and if i look into the config.log it's because it use the default
apple
linker tool witch don't recognize some arguments:
configu
Le 6 sept. 09 à 17:18, Duboucher Thomas a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
Is it ok to commit ?
Please wait a few more days. It's doubtful that anyone would be
interested
(and ca
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
>> Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
>> support?
>> Or should we add supp
> checking whether target compiler is working... no
> configure: error: cannot compile for the target
>
> and if i look into the config.log it's because it use the default apple
> linker tool witch don't recognize some arguments:
>
> configure:5882: gcc-mp-4.4 -o conftest -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointe
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Miller
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
To: phco...@gmail.com
From: "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko"
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:04:00 +0200
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:17 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
Le 6 sept. 09 à 16:54, Robert Millan a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:55:41AM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
Le 5 sept. 09 à 22:31, Robert Millan a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Still the time and space required to build GCC is much larger than
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:03:28PM +0100, Neil Cafferkey wrote:
>
> No offence, but this proposal strikes me as slightly lazy. In other words,
> I think these bugs should be identified instead of being "fixed" by
> declaring "your compiler is too old".
In this case, we weren't speaking about bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan a écrit :
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>> Is it ok to commit ?
>
> Please wait a few more days. It's doubtful that anyone would be interested
> (and capable) of reviewing ruby code, but it's still wor
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >
> > Ok here's now a patch.
> > Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
>
> For 1.97 I'd be more comfortable with a simple s/444/400/. An automated check
> smells
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> Ok here's now a patch.
> Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
For 1.97 I'd be more comfortable with a simple s/444/400/. An automated check
smells like it could have corner cases. In fact I found one:
> @@ -260,6 +260,11
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:12:14PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Robert Millan
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:26:11 +0200
>
> > David et al, can we agree on a minimal version of GCC that we should
> > recommend?
> >
> > For mentioning in the INSTALL file only. I assume nobody's interested in
>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:21:55PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:23:01PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko"
> > Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:12:20 +0200
> >
> > > Even if gcc<4.2 seem to work ok I think we shouldn't waste resources
> > > on
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:38:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> A GRUB_CHMOD
> variable seems overkill, though.
Yes. Please not a new config option just for this. Just pick a reasonable
mode and set to it.
Auto-detection doesn't sound bad, although I'd be fine with just using
0400.
> > Else
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:57 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:43:46PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > > I think it'd be more sensible to do this in grub-mkconfig itself - it
> > > doesn't really fit well
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>
> Is it ok to commit ?
Please wait a few more days. It's doubtful that anyone would be interested
(and capable) of reviewing ruby code, but it's still worth a try.
If noone objects, you can commit this.
--
Robert Millan
The DR
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:55:41AM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>
> Le 5 sept. 09 à 22:31, Robert Millan a écrit :
>
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>>
>>> Still the time and space required to build GCC is much larger than
>>> that required for building grub. The
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:43:46PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > I think it'd be more sensible to do this in grub-mkconfig itself - it
> > doesn't really fit well into the /etc/grub.d/ hook system, which is
> > really just for genera
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
> > Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
> > support?
> > Or shou
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
> Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
> support?
> Or should we add support for a GRUB_CHMOD variable so users can override
> this
Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
support?
Or should we add support for a GRUB_CHMOD variable so users can override
this setting as they please?
Else I'd need to add a /etc/grub.d/999_chmod fi
Le 2 sept. 09 à 18:48, Yves Blusseau a écrit :
ChangeLog:
2009-09-02 Yves Blusseau
Change clean rules to properly remove files
* genmk.rb: add new clean rules
* Makefile.in (clean): add the new targets
(mostlyclean): likewise
---
Makefile.in |4 ++--
genmk.rb| 55
27 matches
Mail list logo
