Re: [PATCH] Bug fix for LVM

2009-07-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:15 +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > BTW, I found a regression on r2421 that cause raid5rec to fail: > > http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/grub2/disk/raid6_recover.c?root=grub&r1=2197&r2=2421 > > buf and buf2 are two different variable. > > This new patch include the

Re: [BUGFIX] Incorrect count of argument with rescue parser

2009-07-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 00:46 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > This patch fixes the parsing of two strings like following ones: > "echo 1 " was parsed into "echo", "1", "" > "echo $root" was parsed into "echo" (variable just disappeared) It would be helpful if you explain how to see the

[BUGFIX] Incorrect count of argument with rescue parser

2009-07-30 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
This patch fixes the parsing of two strings like following ones: "echo 1 " was parsed into "echo", "1", "" "echo $root" was parsed into "echo" (variable just disappeared) -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git diff --git a/ChangeLo

Re: [PATCH] Bug fix for LVM

2009-07-30 Thread Patrik Horník
Hello Bean, great, it is working now. However, "grub-probe -t abstraction" separates different modules with newline character, so grub-mkconfig generates incorrect grub.cfg. Patrik Horník On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 17:15, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > BTW, I found a regression on r2421 that cause raid5re

Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

2009-07-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > > c

Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

2009-07-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > comes before December) > That would be nice because Debian freezes at Decemb

Re: [PATCH] New object format

2009-07-30 Thread Bean
Hi, Update: Now change kernel.img to kernel.mod, and export symbol using GRUB_EXPORT instead of EXPORT_FUNC and EXPORT_VAR. grub-mkimage would link all modules files to generate core.img. The symbol list is generated by grub-mkimage, no need for symlist.c anymore. Here are some test results usin

Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

2009-07-30 Thread adrian15
Felix Zielcke escribió: I think the currently under development part can be now removed. Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully comes before December) That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. adrian15 -- Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Dis

Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?

2009-07-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
The website currently says: Currently under development, GRUB 2, has replaced what was formerly known as GRUB (i.e. version 0.9x), which has, in turn, become GRUB Legacy. I think the currently under development part can be now removed. Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which ho

Re: Patch to compile boot.img properly on OSX

2009-07-30 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:14 +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Pavel, is it ok to commit the patch so we can generate boot.img from >> OSX ? (using L_ label as far as i remember). > > In response to that patch, I was requested to create a