On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 09:04 +1300, Centurion Computer Technology (2005)
Ltd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a raid array named /dev/md/d0
>
> The comand
>
> grub-setup -r "(md0,1)" "(md0)" fails with:
> grub-setup: error: Can't open /dev/md0: No such file or directory.
>
> I have traced this down to
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:11:28 +0800
Bean wrote:
> You're right, LUA is compact yet still powerful, it's quite suitable
> for our purpose. If it's fine with other developers, I can start
> working on it. Oh btw, is the license compatible ?
Lua 5.1 is under the MIT X11 license, which is GPL-compati
Michael Gorven wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 10:50:57 phcoder wrote:
How big is your core.img?
With the following modules (untested), 61K.
configfile sha1 biosdisk pc linux ext2 minicmd crypto aes luks sha256
You don't need to embed linux.mod to the kernel, it can very weel be
loaded from e
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 10:50:57 phcoder wrote:
> How big is your core.img?
With the following modules (untested), 61K.
configfile sha1 biosdisk pc linux ext2 minicmd crypto aes luks sha256
--
http://michael.gorven.za.net
PGP Key ID 6612FE85
S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E
signature.asc
Description: T
With a new swing in normal.mod splitting I think we should reconsider
this patch. It's useless to keep loader.c in kernel without boot
command. IMO it should be moved either to a perate boot.mod (my
preference) or to minicmd.mod (not a good option IMO)
phcoder wrote:
Hello. Now when boot comman
Michael Gorven wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 09:50:17 phcoder wrote:
Michael Gorven wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 04:48:02 steve wrote:
Update, i was able to get the right modules to load into a core.img by
making the encrypted partition start at 1mb instead of 32.5kb, the
modules loaded i
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 09:50:17 phcoder wrote:
> Michael Gorven wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 04:48:02 steve wrote:
> >> Update, i was able to get the right modules to load into a core.img by
> >> making the encrypted partition start at 1mb instead of 32.5kb, the
> >> modules loaded into co
Michael Gorven wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 04:48:02 steve wrote:
Update, i was able to get the right modules to load into a core.img by
making the encrypted partition start at 1mb instead of 32.5kb, the modules
loaded into core.img were:
Nice! I briefly looked at getting everything into co
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 04:48:02 steve wrote:
> Update, i was able to get the right modules to load into a core.img by
> making the encrypted partition start at 1mb instead of 32.5kb, the modules
> loaded into core.img were:
Nice! I briefly looked at getting everything into core.img, but it seeme
