Michał Radomski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
I would recommend using other hashes that md5 (e.g. whirlpool or sha-2)
because it's been depreceated
I chose md5 because it is in grub2 wiki (see command list)
It is not a problem to add sha-2 or whirlpool.
gr
Hello. Here is the patch to load the modules in the space after the
kernel. This patch isn't meant to be commited right now because it
breaks loading huge modules (and solaris relies on it). For clean
solution I'm waiting for Vesa Jääskeläinen's new memory allocator
Second reason is that command
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
> Hello!
> Something odd is going on here. All of a sudden I am only seeing
> messages to the Grub-Devel list for my Google Mail account. And
> absolutely none for my regular ISP managed e-mail address.
>
> To add to the confusion, starting somet
From: Kevin Lacquement
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:03:14 -0700
> If we do that, though, we'll still need to create wrapper headers
> for the headers that flex #includes. Also, does grub depend on gcc,
> or will it work with other C compilers? I'd like to avoid adding a
> dependency on a specific
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> I would recommend using other hashes that md5 (e.g. whirlpool or sha-2)
> because it's been depreceated
I chose md5 because it is in grub2 wiki (see command list)
It is not a problem to add sha-2 or whirlpool.
> Do you already have a c
Hello!
It should be possible to compile grub for i386-pc on a pure x64_64
system with i386 support in the compiler and binutils, but without
32-bit libc or its headers.
It requires several unrelated changes. This is the first step. It's a
pure simplification.
The grub_CHECK_START_SYMBOL define
Hello!
Something odd is going on here. All of a sudden I am only seeing
messages to the Grub-Devel list for my Google Mail account. And
absolutely none for my regular ISP managed e-mail address.
To add to the confusion, starting sometime yesterday the site who
manages (did manage?) the deliver of
Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 09:43 -0700 schrieb Kevin Lacquement:
>
>> Alternatively, is there a clean, portable way to make the C compiler
>> think that the grub headers are actually the system headers? Or
>> possibly to replace the system header calls in the generated C co
Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 09:43 -0700 schrieb Kevin Lacquement:
> Alternatively, is there a clean, portable way to make the C compiler
> think that the grub headers are actually the system headers? Or
> possibly to replace the system header calls in the generated C code?
> (Using sed or somethin
Hello!
It's a shame the discussion about hfs got nowhere. I've made another
patch. I didn't look at the Linux hfs sources or at any previous
patches. I took the case ordering table from hfsutils 3.2.6, which is
licensed under GPL v2 or newer. Then I ran the table through a simple
program to ma
Marco Gerards wrote:
> Kevin Lacquement writes:
>
>> Again looking at the script parser, I notices that it uses a
>> Yacc-generated parser, but a hand-written tokenizer. Is there a reason
>> that it doesn't use Lex? Is it due to external dependencies, and if so,
>> is there a way to recreate the
Hello I discovered some memory leaks. Here is the fix
The main one was is that if a hash collision occurs new cache entry
overwrites the old one but the old one wasn't freed. When loading a big
file it was leaking huge amounts of memory
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Index: kern/dis
Michał Radomski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:16:16AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
Michał Radomski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
It's funny, we're all discussing about performing security measurements in
GRUB and nobody mentioned that our user interface lac
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:16:16AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> Michał Radomski wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> It's funny, we're all discussing about performing security measurements in
>>> GRUB and nobody mentioned that our user interface lacks even the mos
Michał Radomski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
It's funny, we're all discussing about performing security measurements in
GRUB and nobody mentioned that our user interface lacks even the most basic
lock mechanism :-)
Actualy... I'm working on password comm
15 matches
Mail list logo
