On Friday 07 November 2008 20:07:07 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:20:57PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > Also, a similar technique can be used to implement "getting an output as
> > a string". For example:
> >
> > # Use the same password as the super user.
> > set pass
I think this is pretty much what I'm in the middle of doing. I want to
put the infrastructure in place so that we can handle an arbitrary PCI
device but I will only put the actual code in to handle the PCI card that
I have (the only one I can test).
What I'm doing is creating a table that matches
Hi,
- Original Message
> From: Viswesh S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: The development of GRUB 2
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 October, 2008 5:04:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Bean
> > To: The development of GRUB 2
> > Sent: M
Hi,
I thought it would be a good idea to split tar & cpio into separate modules
to save some space and make things easier to figure out for the users. I
managed to do this without duplicating code, with a bit of pre-processor
magic.
The saved size is not much, though (~400 bytes). But users lo
Robert Millan wrote:
> Sounds good. But do we have support for "weak" symbol dependencies a la
> dlym() ?
I tried it once while traveling and you can dynamically check for
function symbols and then start using them if they are loaded. Thou... I
do not know how reference counting is then affected.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:23:32PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> >
> > Why not use PCI ID to support this particular card? This way Donald doesn't
> > have to support all cards, but the base is laid out so more cards can be
> > added
> > in the future.
>
> I have nothing against that. But i
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 06:52:21PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Bad news, I heard back from the two people who wrote the PCI serial
>>> code for Linux (Russell King & Ted Tso) and they both agree that,
>>> no matter how the ambiguity got int
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote:
> >
> >How would the whole picture look like? Sounds like it'd mean less
> >complexity
> >in external modules at the expense of more complexity in the build system.
>
> Here a first proof-of-concept patch, uses hello.c as the exte
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 10:51:23AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since it looks like the ABI part inspires more need for debate/discussion,
> I propose merging the rest first. Support for ABI tracking is not essential
> for building external modules (in Debian, it's barely necessary).
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 06:52:21PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Bad news, I heard back from the two people who wrote the PCI serial
> > code for Linux (Russell King & Ted Tso) and they both agree that,
> > no matter how the ambiguity got into the Linux source files
10 matches
Mail list logo
