On Monday 28 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> > > >However on the last test I did make an error and left out the -
grub-probe --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map --target=partmap --device /dev/md0
showed pc
and then segfaulted
/dev/md0 is raid1 with 2 disks but the second was just added to it, so
it's syncing
I try to trace this down and maybe provide a patch but probable someone
else here is better and faster
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 00:28 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > At least we should put a message into *.mk files that would make it
> > clear that they are generated.
> >
> >
>
> Yes.
Done.
> For a release tarball, It IMO also makes sense to include
> util/parser.tab.c.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> > > >However on the last test I did make an error
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> > >However on the last test I did make an error and left out the -d
> > > option to grub-probe, and that's required for
On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> >However on the last test I did make an error and left out the -d
> > option to grub-probe, and that's required for the grub-probe to succeed,
> > so unfortunately the output I posted i
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
>
>However on the last test I did make an error and left out the -d option to
> grub-probe, and that's required for the grub-probe to succeed, so
> unfortunately the output I posted is erroneous.
>A new one is attached which h
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:05:33AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> Another updated TSC patch. Now it detects TSC support for x86 CPUs at
> runtime and selects either the TSC or RTC time source. This way 386
> and 486 CPUs without RDTSC instruction support are supported.
>
> Robert Millan was int
Another updated TSC patch. Now it detects TSC support for x86 CPUs at
runtime and selects either the TSC or RTC time source. This way 386
and 486 CPUs without RDTSC instruction support are supported.
Robert Millan was interested in getting this patch merged for the
Coreboot port, so I decided to
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:44:16AM -0400, Richard Michael wrote:
>
> It is planned for Grub2 to support booting from 1.0 superblocks?
Only if/when someone volunteers to work on it.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may acce
Mike,
> Why not use Raid-10 instead of this more complex setup?
I don't much about RAID10, and it's an mdadm special case. I felt it
was cleaner to just have two separate arrays (well, three..). Also, I
need to remove half the array on a regular basis, and rejoin it
afterware for resync. I'm g
On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:31, Richard Michael wrote:
Hello list,
Apologies if this is a "support" question that doesn't belong on the
devel list. (I've been looking into RAID/LVM improvements in grub2
and
thought this list might be appropriate, however.)
I have a linux system with 8 disks.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:35:51PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> (Probable Lubomir is subscribed but just in case sending the mail to
> him, he made originally the Wiki page and is hosting the patch.)
>
> I just tried that GRUB in qemu debugging with GDB stuff.
> The Stuff on that Wiki page is a b
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:31:22AM -0400, Richard Michael wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Apologies if this is a "support" question that doesn't belong on the
> devel list. (I've been looking into RAID/LVM improvements in grub2 and
> thought this list might be appropriate, however.)
>
> I have a linux
(Probable Lubomir is subscribed but just in case sending the mail to
him, he made originally the Wiki page and is hosting the patch.)
I just tried that GRUB in qemu debugging with GDB stuff.
The Stuff on that Wiki page is a bit outdated.
I'm not that familiar with such things but maybe I can try t
Hello list,
Apologies if this is a "support" question that doesn't belong on the
devel list. (I've been looking into RAID/LVM improvements in grub2 and
thought this list might be appropriate, however.)
I have a linux system with 8 disks. I would like to divide them into
groups of 4 and create 2
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 05:28:00PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Any comments on this? I'm inclined to remove the check (or disable it, or
> turn it into a warning), but I'd like to hear what everyone else thinks
> first.
I just turned it into a grub_dprintf() warning.
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008
17 matches
Mail list logo
