Hi,
I prefer to the first layout.
trunk
grub
grub2
if you not need grub, just move grub2 dir like this .../trunk/grub2
but if both need, the trunk dir is easy way.
for tags and branches, all alike trunk.
the style svn layout make we all can be just one command.
IMO, :)
2008/7/16 walt <[E
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 00:23:53 Pavel Roskin wrote:
Yes, that's my suggestion. I understand that you may feel uneasy about
it, but I don't think we are going to do many releases from the legacy
branch, maybe one or none at all.
It's OK to have stable and developmen
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
I think we have seen tons of examples with GRUB Legacy which may not be solved
automatically in all cases. If one digs into the archive of bug-grub, I guess
several cases would be found easily. With GRUB 2, we can avoid embedding BIOS
drive numb
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 01:32 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> If a boot drive is the same as a root drive, you are right. Otherwise we need
> to do so.
>
> I think we have seen tons of examples with GRUB Legacy which may not be
> solved
> automatically in all cases. If one digs into the archiv
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 01:21:57 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 01:15 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > OK. Then how do you install GRUB into (hd1) in a development machine,
> > which is (hd0) in a booting machine? When GRUB may not correctly
> > determine BIOS drives, do you want
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 01:15 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> OK. Then how do you install GRUB into (hd1) in a development machine, which
> is
> (hd0) in a booting machine? When GRUB may not correctly determine BIOS
> drives, do you want to just give up?
The boot drive can be determined at bo
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 00:23:53 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Yes, that's my suggestion. I understand that you may feel uneasy about
> it, but I don't think we are going to do many releases from the legacy
> branch, maybe one or none at all.
>
> It's OK to have stable and development branches. grub-le
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 00:31:39 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 23:04 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > I am sorry, but can I ask why you want to remove device.map? Did I miss
> > any discussion?
>
> There was a short discussion, but I write it more concisely now.
>
> 1) We don't
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 23:04 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> I am sorry, but can I ask why you want to remove device.map? Did I miss any
> discussion?
There was a short discussion, but I write it more concisely now.
1) We don't want to cache anything. Any cached information risks to
become s
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 23:02 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> I don't agree on this. GRUB Legacy and GRUB 2 are developed fully
> independently (if any). If we follow your way, the repository would look like
> this:
>
> branches/
> grub-legacy/
> prepare_0_97/
> prepare_0_98/
> prepare
On Monday 14 July 2008 15:03:04 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Now that we have lzma compression, we should probably consider making
> another release in a week or two.
>
> Before it happens, I'd like to add a configure test for working target
> compiler, so that users of pure x86_64 machines are not surpri
On Monday 14 July 2008 14:37:45 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 03:54 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank all of you for making effort on moving the version control system
> > to Subversion. I think this is a big improvement, and I like it.
> >
> > Now, I would lik
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Robert Millan schrieb:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
The first (and last) grub package released in the Cygwin
distribution was based on grub codebase from 2008-03-26. My latest
reasonably tested merge is ~2 month old. If desired, I can
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
The first (and last) grub package released in the Cygwin distribution
was based on grub codebase from 2008-03-26. My latest reasonably tested
merge is ~2 month old. If desired, I can merge & test all remai
Robert Millan schrieb:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
The first (and last) grub package released in the Cygwin distribution
was based on grub codebase from 2008-03-26. My latest reasonably tested
merge is ~2 month old. If desired, I can merge & test all remain
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:43:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> and when they're only left with their illegitimate features, [...]
or maybe I should say "anti-features"
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
>
> The first (and last) grub package released in the Cygwin distribution
> was based on grub codebase from 2008-03-26. My latest reasonably tested
> merge is ~2 month old. If desired, I can merge & test all remaining
> changes t
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:45:18AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2008 07:57:30 Jean-Christophe Haessig wrote:
> > Le mardi 08 juillet 2008 à 07:32 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > In fact, you want to write a GRUB module which deciphers a partition
> > wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
