Re: [PATCH] ext4 extent support

2008-07-10 Thread Felix Zielcke
From: "Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:59 PM To: "The development of GRUB 2" Subject: [PATCH] ext4 extent support Hi, This patch add support for extents in ext4. -- Bean Any news? Will it be committed soon? Just saw that there's a commit on e2fsprogs 1.41 wich enabl

Re: Endianness macros capitalization

2008-07-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting Christian Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: GCC optimizer does a good job optimizing register use, but function call is still better: Debian gcc 4.1.2-7: inline (portable)=357,asm (%%eax)=126, asm (%0)=107, function=104 Cygwin gcc 3.4.4: inline (portable)=340, asm (%%eax)=124, asm (%0)=104,

Re: Endianness macros capitalization

2008-07-10 Thread Christian Franke
Pavel Roskin wrote: On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:50 +0200, Christian Franke wrote: Result with the test script from my last mail: Debian gcc 4.1.2-7: inline (portable)=357, inline (asm)=126, function=104 Cygwin gcc 3.4.4: inline (portable)=340, inline (asm)=124, function=96 Function call is s

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Bean
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no such function. Somebody could write a cron script that > would check the Subversion repository and send messages for new commits. > But such things is not my strong side. I'll appreciate if somebody else > does

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Isaac Dupree
Bean wrote: It have switched to svn now, cvs is not updated anymore. like this, then svn co svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/grub/trunk/grub2/ ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 00:31 +0800, Bean wrote: > It have switched to svn now, cvs is not updated anymore. Can we turn CVS off? We could remove all files as the first step. > But there is > a small issue, email notification is not working at the moment, you > need to run svn update once in a whi

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Bean
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pavel Roskin wrote: >> >> Quoting Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> As per the "GRUB Loading kernel" discussion (interpreting silence as >>> "send a patch"). I guess I need to write a ChangeLog entry, is there >>> a

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Isaac Dupree
Pavel Roskin wrote: Quoting Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As per the "GRUB Loading kernel" discussion (interpreting silence as "send a patch"). I guess I need to write a ChangeLog entry, is there anything telling me how to do that? I looked at other examples on this list and wasn't sure h

Re: [PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As per the "GRUB Loading kernel" discussion (interpreting silence as "send a patch"). I guess I need to write a ChangeLog entry, is there anything telling me how to do that? I looked at other examples on this list and wasn't sure how to apply them here

[PATCH] GRUB Loading message

2008-07-10 Thread Isaac Dupree
As per the "GRUB Loading kernel" discussion (interpreting silence as "send a patch"). I guess I need to write a ChangeLog entry, is there anything telling me how to do that? I looked at other examples on this list and wasn't sure how to apply them here. Is there anything else I'm missing? I

Re: [PATCH] Fix chainloding + Chainloading into logical partitions

2008-07-10 Thread Bean
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Lucas Gadani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Lucas Gadani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 18:41, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like it increases pc.mod code to store information that is only

Re: [PATCH] Fix chainloding + Chainloading into logical partitions

2008-07-10 Thread Lucas Gadani
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Lucas Gadani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 18:41, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Looks like it increases pc.mod code to store information that is only useful >> to the chainloader. Is there a reason for not having the chainloade