On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:02:46PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:35:41PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> >
> >> /dev/sda9 is not a valid OpenBSD partition, and in partmap/pc.c:176 the
> >> iteration fails with an error: invalid disk label magic 0x%x.
To implement a nice GUI with some animations, it will be important to
have a timer with a better resolution than 1/18 second (which appears
to be the current GRUB timer resolution on the PC).
What would be the best way to do this? Possibilities that I am aware of
are:
* RDTSC instruction (must c
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:35:41PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> /dev/sda9 is not a valid OpenBSD partition, and in partmap/pc.c:176 the
>> iteration fails with an error: invalid disk label magic 0x%x.
>> If I replace that return with a continue, it works.
>>
>> The probl
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:35:41PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
>
> /dev/sda9 is not a valid OpenBSD partition, and in partmap/pc.c:176 the
> iteration fails with an error: invalid disk label magic 0x%x.
> If I replace that return with a continue, it works.
>
> The problem is that grub2 stops lookin
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:03:08PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 14:53 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > If you want to test the full functionality, try using grub-probe to convert
> > /dev/xvda1 to a grub drive (this checks GRUB knows how to count partitions
> > in Xen devices).
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 08:34:33PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> linux_find_partition() is used to make it possible to access partitions
> using the native OS devices for the partitions, rather than the device
> for the whole drive.
>
> As new devices are supported by GRUB, linux_find_p
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 07:32:42PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>+ char devpath[sizeof ("/dev/sda15") + 13];
> >>
> >
> >Where does this 13 come from? Would be nice to make it explicit (e.g.
> >sizeof(something) or so).
>
> 13 "paranoia" bytes added to the required size :-)
A comment s
On Thursday 08 May 2008 17:45:27 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 11:53 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote:
> > > Try the CVS version. Try debugging the codedump.
> >
Done, same segfault.
> As for debugging, I see you have found something already.
>
> > Good, next step?
>
> Try the version
El Friday 09 May 2008 16:26:28 Pavel Roskin escribió:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:13 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote:
> > > Neither could I :-(
> >
> > It does not happen in other two AMD64 machines here!!
> > Only on this one.
>
> That confirms my suspicion that the problem is not related to any x86_6