grub EFI signature should be little endian

2006-12-05 Thread bibo,mao
hi, EFI bootloader signature is "EFIL" string, x86 machine is little-endian. This patch changes grub efi booloader sigature as little-endian. thanks bibo,mao --- grub2.org/include/grub/i386/linux.h 2006-12-06 17:51:19.0 +0800 +++ grub2/include/grub/i386/linux.h 2006-12-06 17:52:50.0

Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional

2006-12-05 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Monday 04 December 2006 17:43, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > It should be pretty clear that 32 bits are a finite number, and tags are > unlimited. In fact it's worse than that, since the bit partitioning > means we have far fewer available bits for any particular flag. Tags are also finite, too, th

Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional

2006-12-05 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:09, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > I am all for something that is simple. Initially it looked like > > Hollis' proposal was more complex, but IIRC he mentioned he wanted to > > work on making this easier to use. Isn't this what he did? Or did I > > misunderstand somet

Re: grub2 accessibility: beeps

2006-12-05 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Monday 04 December 2006 21:40, Marco Gerards wrote: > Well, the point that I am trying to make is that I would like to use > hooks for this in some way. So you are not agreeing with the first > alternative I suggested. But you ignored the second alternative, > which was the most important part

Re: GRUB2 - testing report, hppa support?

2006-12-05 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Monday 04 December 2006 15:45, Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote: > The documentation is pretty bad and grub-install is half broken > (will perhaps fix it, when I've time). Any patch is welcome. > > grub-setup's --help is confusing, it does not tell the user that > the images will be changed.

Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional

2006-12-05 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:35 +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Saturday 02 December 2006 17:18, Marco Gerards wrote: > >> What is the problem with typing? I do not think this is really > >> complex? > > > > Weird. It was _you_ who pointed out t