font in open firmware

2005-08-19 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
I have implemented a new function getcharwidth in the terminal interface. I updated all terminals for PC but didn't ofconsole. This is only because I don't know how it behaves precisely. According the standard, the default font seems to be implementation-dependent. There is an attribute "charac

Re: [PATCH] x86_64 again (related with my previous topics)

2005-08-19 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Saturday 20 August 2005 00:18, Ruslan Nikolaev wrote: > First of all I want to say that all things I said are related with x86_64. > x86_64 implements 48-bit virtual address space. As AMD writes the bits from > 64 to 48 (or implementation limit) should be all ones or all zeros. In that > case wi

[PATCH] x86_64 again (related with my previous topics)

2005-08-19 Thread Ruslan Nikolaev
Hi all! First of all I want to say that all things I said are related with x86_64.x86_64 implements 48-bit virtual address space. As AMD writes the bits from 64 to 48 (or implementation limit) should be all ones or all zeros.In that case with have "sign-extended" address.Also x86_64 uses 4 memory m