Re: Broken A20 gate handling

2005-07-01 Thread Peter Jones
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:35 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ludovic Drolez wrote: > >> I think it's really important to fix grub's code (by stealing code > >> from isolinux ?), > > > > Also, I've just found that for the linux kernel, they also used >

Re: [Bulk] Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL & FSF copyright assignment)

2005-07-01 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ludovic Drolez wrote: > Moreover, IMHO, it makes no sense trying to rewrite such low level > functions, since there are not hundreds ways of writing it ! There are at least 2 ways : 1) copy-paste code 2) read specs, implement them - following the dire

Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL)

2005-07-01 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Friday 01 July 2005 19:01, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > Yes this code is critical, as you see flaws in this code makes grub > unusable on new PCs (freeze without *any* error message). Since it's the > most critical part of grub, why simply not use the most stable code > available for A20 handling: th

Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL)

2005-07-01 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: In the case of the A20, I'm not sure how I want to implement it. It is not that bad to use syslinux code, because we have our own alternative. However, this code is very critical, and I prefer writing our own code. After all, my opinion looks like the same as Marco. :p

Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL)

2005-07-01 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Jul 1, 2005, at 7:43 AM, Ludovic Drolez wrote: Marco Gerards wrote: I think it is not possible for us to use syslinux/isolinux code I think. For GRUB the copyrights need to be assigned to the FSF before a patch can be applied. !?!?!? There's no such requirement in the GNU GPL ! (and sysl

Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL)

2005-07-01 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
Hello Ludovic, On Friday 01 July 2005 14:43, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > Marco Gerards wrote: > > I think it is not possible for us to use syslinux/isolinux code I > > think. For GRUB the copyrights need to be assigned to the FSF before > > a patch can be applied. > > !?!?!? I am afraid that Marco m

Re: Broken A20 gate handling

2005-07-01 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Marco Gerards wrote: Didn't syslinux/isolinux use linux code? I don't think so, in setup.S you can read: * * New A20 code ported from SYSLINUX by H. Peter Anvin. AMD Elan bugfixes * by Robert Schwebel, December 2001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ -- Ludovic DROLEZ _

Re: Broken A20 gate handling (about GPL)

2005-07-01 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Marco Gerards wrote: I think it is not possible for us to use syslinux/isolinux code I think. For GRUB the copyrights need to be assigned to the FSF before a patch can be applied. !?!?!? There's no such requirement in the GNU GPL ! (and syslinux is GPLed) If collaborative work is impossible

Re: Broken A20 gate handling

2005-07-01 Thread Marco Gerards
Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ludovic Drolez wrote: >> I think it's really important to fix grub's code (by stealing code >> from isolinux ?), > > Also, I've just found that for the linux kernel, they also used > sys/isolinux's code. Didn't syslinux/isolinux use linux code? I thin

Re: Broken A20 gate handling

2005-07-01 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Ludovic Drolez wrote: I think it's really important to fix grub's code (by stealing code from isolinux ?), Also, I've just found that for the linux kernel, they also used sys/isolinux's code. Cheers, Ludovic DROLEZ ___ Grub-devel mailing list