Re: diffman(1)

Hi onf, On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 05:08:48PM +0100, onf wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > > On Mon Nov 25, 2024 at 1:44 PM CET, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > You may find it useful for development of manual pages. If so, please > > let me know any feedback you have for it. I was wondering if I should > > p

Re: diffman(1)

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 01:44:07PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi! > > I've developed a new program (actually, a bash script) that diffs manual > pages. I find it quite useful for quickly seeing differences between a > page as installed in the system, and the file I'm working on. The > out

Re: diffman(1)

Hi Alejandro, On Mon Nov 25, 2024 at 1:44 PM CET, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > You may find it useful for development of manual pages. If so, please > let me know any feedback you have for it. I was wondering if I should > pipe to less -R, just like man(1) does. For now, having doubts, I kept > i

diffman(1)

Hi! I've developed a new program (actually, a bash script) that diffs manual pages. I find it quite useful for quickly seeing differences between a page as installed in the system, and the file I'm working on. The output is diff -u of formatted manual pages (suitable for less -R). You can find

Re: Line-breaking style in documentation source (was Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] proc_pid_fdinfo.5: Reduce indent for most of the page)

At 2024-11-24T23:04:23-0600, Dave Kemper wrote: > Every time I look at a diff in groff.texi, and I have to spend some > time figuring out what *actually* changed versus what merely got > reflowed, I wish that that manual used manpage-style line breaking > internally. You might be interested in or