Hi onf,
At 2024-11-18T21:43:24+0100, onf wrote:
> > The alternative diff is simple:
> > [...]
> > + warning (WARN_SYNTAX, "not interpreting escaped '%1' in device"
> > + " extension command request argument", char(c1));
> > + else
> > + warning(WARN_SYNTAX, "
Hi Branden,
On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 12:37 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2024-11-18T21:43:24+0100, onf wrote:
> > [...]
> > Just a small nitpick, but you should probably do s/(warning) /\1/.
>
> Yes, that was a code style goof. Thanks! Fixed.
Hopefully the way I suggested... GNU's code
On Mon Nov 18, 2024 at 5:30 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> I solicit opinions, from anyone, on the foregoing.
>
> Here's the behavior of the `device` request after this change.
>
> $ printf '.device ps:exec A B\\~C\\ D\\0E\\|F\\^G\\h".5m"I\\v".5m"J\n' |
> ./build/test-groff -Zww | gr
On Sunday, 17 November 2024 22:17:08 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Deri,
>
> At 2024-11-17T20:35:34+, Deri wrote:
> > On Sunday, 17 November 2024 04:42:47 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I have added 3 tickets to the release goals.
> > >
> > > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64484
>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 07:39:09PM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2024-11-19T01:47:33+0100, onf wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 12:37 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > At 2024-11-18T21:43:24+0100, onf wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > Just a small nitpick, but you should probably do s/(
On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 4:14 AM CET, onf wrote:
> #define min(x,y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
> int i = 1;
> printf("min = %s\n", min(i++, 3));
> which prints:
> min = 2
s/%s/%d/. I wrote too much shell lately.
At 2024-11-19T01:47:33+0100, onf wrote:
> On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 12:37 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At 2024-11-18T21:43:24+0100, onf wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Just a small nitpick, but you should probably do s/(warning) /\1/.
> >
> > Yes, that was a code style goof. Thanks! Fixed.
>
> H
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:44 PM Oliver Corff via GNU roff typesetting
system discussion wrote:
> In me, adding a footer with .fo 'arg left'arg center'arg right' works as
> expected, with the blatantly obvious limitation that the elements of the
> footer should not contain line breaks.
>
> However,
On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 2:39 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> Personally, I have a strong distaste for jamming parentheses up against
> control structure keywords, like `if(` or `switch(`, though I know some
> disciples of old-school Bell Labs code will cling to it unto death.
>
> I also
Hi Deri,
Thanks for your reply--I think we are making some headway toward a
meeting of the minds here.
At 2024-11-18T13:52:01+, Deri wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 November 2024 22:17:08 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1. What are your acceptance criteria for a 1.24.0 release
> > candidate?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
