tadziu,
I missed your mail/suggestion regarding reinsertion of the `.ll -8n' request in .XA and only today
became aware of it due to the reverted commit (so too late to confirm that indeed this fixes the
main issue perfectly -- you know that already ;)).
thanks a whole lot for pointing this o
[replying only to the lists since you're clearly subscribed, or
otherwise following them]
Hi Joerg,
At 2024-10-13T12:36:23+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> On 13.10.24 11:24, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> it seems it would probably be best to just agree to disagree and move
> on, but ...
Where w
On 13.10.24 11:24, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi Joerg,
hi branden,
it seems it would probably be best to just agree to disagree and move on, but
...
At 2024-10-13T11:03:52+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
but I really believe the line should never have been deleted in the
first place (
Hi Joerg,
At 2024-10-13T11:03:52+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> but I really believe the line should never have been deleted in the
> first place (I think the working hypothesis should better be "even if
> I do not see why it is there and even if it seems superfluous to me,
> it is there for a
I want to in the future sometime, submit a nice macro package I'm creating to
savannah. However, can the macro package itself be licensed and if yes, you
must also use the same license like other types of programs say python (Where
if you import a GPL licensed script, that too must be GPL)? It c
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:31 AM G. Branden Robinson
wrote:
> It isn't, yet. What you have seen is a Savannah bug report about it.[2]
> It was filed anonymously. ("Who _was_ that masked man?" Dave Kemper, I
> reckon.)
Guilty. I (sometimes) anonymously file tickets in which I have no
personal i
Hi Matthew,
At 2024-10-13T12:11:24+, Matthew Polk wrote:
> I want to in the future sometime, submit a nice macro package I'm
> creating to savannah.
Good to hear! I'm curious--do you mean for distribution with groff or
as an independent Savannah project?
> However, can the macro package its
On 13.10.24 15:31, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[replying only to the lists since you're clearly subscribed, or
otherwise following them]
Hi Joerg,
hi branden,
At 2024-10-13T12:36:23+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
On 13.10.24 11:24, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
it seems it would probably b
Hi, thanks for the very swift and verbose response. :)
I figured previously that it probably wouldn't be included in groff upstream at
the time of this writing, but if there is a possibly of inclusion I am more
than delighted to hand over copyright to maintainers (Which I believe is the
FSF). I
