Hi Branden,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:59:58AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Difference from v1
> ==
> Support reuse of previously computed indentation, to line up function
> arguments and similar across multiple synopses. Requested by Alex
> Colomar.
>
> Pro
Quoth G. Branden Robinson:
I have been dissatisfied with groff man(7)'s SY and YS macros for a long
time. My primary grievance is one that has frustrated its uptake by
documenters of libraries: the macros are designed for synopsizing Unix
commands, not C library functions.
After working on the
Hi Lennart,
At 2024-04-26T21:54:15+, Lennart Jablonka wrote:
> Quoth G. Branden Robinson:
> > I have been dissatisfied with groff man(7)'s SY and YS macros for a
> > long time. My primary grievance is one that has frustrated its
> > uptake by documenters of libraries: the macros are designed
[ Not subscribed to the linux-man list, so please cc me if
replying there. ]
Hi all,
As someone who's much more familiar with mdoc(7) than man(7), is
there an approximate 'correspondence table' somewhere that gives
at least a rough sense of which man(7) macros to use when, in an
mdoc(7) c
