On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> Hello Gavin,
>
> The new URL of the node version is
> https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
> And there is a mono version.
>
> A patch is attached.
>
> Best,
> Thérèse
Do you know why they made this change? They have
Le 30/09/2023 à 17:22, Gavin Smith a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
Hello Gavin,
The new URL of the node version is
https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
And there is a mono version.
A patch is attached.
Best,
Thérèse
Do you know why they
Hi Gavin & Thérèse,
At 2023-09-30T16:22:32+0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> > Hello Gavin,
> >
> > The new URL of the node version is
> > https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
> > And there is a mono version.
> >
> > A patch
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:15:09PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At the time I wrote that, I was unaware that "html_node", spelled
> thus, was a solidified and inflexible convention of GNU
> documentation. (Where is this documented?) We resolved the problem
> for ourselves,
Hi,
Gavin Smith wrote on Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 08:10:01PM +0100:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:15:09PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> 4. "They might have changed this by mistake."
>>
>> Sort of. I find the "html_node" name uglier, but if there's popular
>> demand to switch it (back
Hi Ingo,
At 2023-09-30T22:07:44+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Now that i see this bumpy ride explained at length, i realize the
> link on this overview page of mine is currently broken, too:
>
> https://mandoc.bsd.lv/links.html
>
> First paragraph, first line, second link ("manual").
> Rather p
