Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Hi Branden,
Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should be
bold because it's part of a heading or roman because it's variable part
within italics. How would you format it?
Thanks,
Alex
man7/time_namespaces.7 | 2 +-
man7/user_na
Hi Alex,
Short answer: take the patch. :)
At 2023-03-12T12:02:04+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should
> be bold because it's part of a heading or roman because it's variable
> part within italics. How would you format it?
> diff
Hi Bruno,
I neglected to reply to your suggestions below.
At 2023-03-06T17:53:55+0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > It (and intptr_t) are "optional", apparently. What do you suggest?
>
> They are optional in theory, but all platforms have them. Just include
> (in C, with help from Gnulib's 'stdint'
Hi Branden,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023, 18:50 G. Branden Robinson <
g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I neglected to reply to your suggestions below.
>
> At 2023-03-06T17:53:55+0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > > It (and intptr_t) are "optional", apparently. What do you suggest?
> >
> >
Hi Branden,
On 3/12/23 17:44, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Short answer: take the patch. :)
I pushed it earlier today. :)
> At 2023-03-12T12:02:04+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should
>> be bold because it's part o
Howdy Ralph,
On 11/10/22 10:31, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Howdy Alejandro,
>
[...]
>>> My patch just changes
>>> #define length(s) (sizeof(s) - 1)
>>> to:
>>> #define length(s) (nitems(s) - 1)
>>>
>>> (nitems() is defined to be the obvious sizeof division (called
>>> ARRAY_SIZE(9) i