[PATCH] man7/: ffix

2023-03-12 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar --- Hi Branden, Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should be bold because it's part of a heading or roman because it's variable part within italics. How would you format it? Thanks, Alex man7/time_namespaces.7 | 2 +- man7/user_na

Re: [PATCH] man7/: ffix

2023-03-12 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Alex, Short answer: take the patch. :) At 2023-03-12T12:02:04+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should > be bold because it's part of a heading or roman because it's variable > part within italics. How would you format it? > diff

Re: [platform-testers] groff 1.23.0.rc3 on native Windows

2023-03-12 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Bruno, I neglected to reply to your suggestions below. At 2023-03-06T17:53:55+0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > It (and intptr_t) are "optional", apparently. What do you suggest? > > They are optional in theory, but all platforms have them. Just include > (in C, with help from Gnulib's 'stdint'

Re: [platform-testers] groff 1.23.0.rc3 on native Windows

2023-03-12 Thread Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
Hi Branden, On Sun, Mar 12, 2023, 18:50 G. Branden Robinson < g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > I neglected to reply to your suggestions below. > > At 2023-03-06T17:53:55+0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > It (and intptr_t) are "optional", apparently. What do you suggest? > > > >

Re: [PATCH] man7/: ffix

2023-03-12 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Branden, On 3/12/23 17:44, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Short answer: take the patch. :) I pushed it earlier today. :) > At 2023-03-12T12:02:04+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> Should I apply this patch? I'm not sure if the variable part should >> be bold because it's part o

Re: sizeof in Macros. (Was: Specifying dependencies more clearly)

2023-03-12 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Howdy Ralph, On 11/10/22 10:31, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Howdy Alejandro, > [...] >>> My patch just changes >>> #define length(s) (sizeof(s) - 1) >>> to: >>> #define length(s) (nitems(s) - 1) >>> >>> (nitems() is defined to be the obvious sizeof division (called >>> ARRAY_SIZE(9) i