ready for groff 1.23.0.rc2

2022-12-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Bertrand, Please pull the trigger on groff 1.23.0.rc2 at your convenience. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help or expedite. We're standing at exactly 400 bugs fixed since 1.22.4. As discussed earlier this year, the only changes I expect to make before 1.23.0 final are documentat

Re: Wanted: your historical me(7) documents (was: [groff] 08/21: [me]: Integrate better with papersize.tmac.)

2022-12-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Dave, At 2022-12-24T17:19:15-0600, Dave Kemper wrote: > Snipping most of this message, as it's stuff where either I agree or > no response seems necessary. No worries. > On 12/13/22, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > >> Still, as long as the release notes mention the default line-length > >> chan

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2022-12-24T23:39:07+, Deri wrote: > > "o" for the former. > > 'That said, https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/code-mailx-1.pdf (beware: > > 1MB!), realized with newest minor of mdocmx on groff > > 1.23.0.rc1.2915-c6d7, That is 730 commits behind master, FWIW. > Since this was produced by gropdf you don

Re: man(7), hyphen, and minus

2022-12-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2022-12-24T14:43:44-0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I probably should have assumed. One of the things that I've noticed > over and over about free software is that nothing new ever truly > replaces something old in a comprehensive sense. I can think of very > few programs that truly no one is usin

Re: man(7), hyphen, and minus

2022-12-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Branden, > > # Get a count of the number of lines before the first blank line, which > > # we'll pass to .Vb as its parameter. This tells *roff to keep that > > many > > # lines together. We don't want to tell *roff to keep huge blocks > > # together. > > my @lines = spli

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Steffen, > On Saturday, 24 December 2022 17:31:38 GMT Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > "o" for the former. > > 'That said, https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/code-mailx-1.pdf (beware: > > 1MB!), realized with newest minor of mdocmx on groff > > 1.23.0.rc1.2915-c6d7, via pdfmark.tmac, causes the outline pane to

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
G. Branden Robinson wrote in <20221227095728.c7oo2iolmg6hl4nw@illithid>: |At 2022-12-24T23:39:07+, Deri wrote: |>> "o" for the former. |>> 'That said, https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/code-mailx-1.pdf (beware: |>> 1MB!), realized with newest minor of mdocmx on groff |>> 1.23.0.rc1.2915-c6d7, | |T

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Ralph Corderoy wrote in <2022122714.845141f...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>: |Hi Steffen, ... |Deri means you. Dunno, Ralph. Thanks, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks hims

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2022-12-27T23:43:00+0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > G. Branden Robinson wrote in > <20221227095728.c7oo2iolmg6hl4nw@illithid>: > |At 2022-12-24T23:39:07+, Deri wrote: > |>> "o" for the former. > |>> 'That said, https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/code-mailx-1.pdf (beware: > |>> 1MB!), realized with

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
G. Branden Robinson wrote in <20221227232513.6zeaunnqaywtrxvw@illithid>: ... |I haven't looked at it Buddy, it is where you got your _idea_ from. So do not mind i unsubscribe to stop you spamming my inbox with your shit, Mr. infinitely scaling intellectual. When s-roff will ever spring into ex

Re: Wanted: your historical me(7) documents (was: [groff] 08/21: [me]: Integrate better with papersize.tmac.)

2022-12-27 Thread Dave Kemper
On 12/27/22, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2022-12-24T17:19:15-0600, Dave Kemper wrote: >> The thing I was saying NEWS should mention is that for -me >> users targeting troff, the default line length has changed from (its >> long-entrenched historical) 6i to (the arguably saner) 6.5i. > > Well,

Re: UNDERSCORE formatting question for "mom"

2022-12-27 Thread Steve Ross via
> Peter will probably have a more elegant (and likely more correct) > solution, but this may work for you: > > Replace the “\&.” with “\h'-\w' 'u'.”.  This worked for me in the one > experiment that I tried. > > --Dale Dale, Thank you for pointing me in the direction that you did.  I learned a lo

Re: Viewing PDFs. (Was: Happy new Sun)

2022-12-27 Thread Lennart Jablonka
Quoth G. Branden Robinson: And... But ok you are the maintainer and can do whatever you want, and break downstream people any way you like, Stop whining. You sound like humm. At the risk of implying that there are people that do complain in that way, I want to distance myself from excessiv